Preview

Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION

Advanced search

Anaesthesia in Correction of Anorectal Defects in Children

https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-3-87-95

Abstract

Anorectal abnormalities are among the most common congenital malformations in children requiring emergency surgical interventions.

The objective is to analyze existing domestic and foreign publications on the features of anesthesia in anorectal abnormalities in children.

Subjects and Methods. The search for publications was carried out in the abstract bases of Russian Scientific Citation Index, PubMed and Scopus according to the key words: anorectal abnormalities, anesthesia, regional anesthesia, children. 105 publications were found, 49 studies were selected for analysis.

Results. For the purpose of anesthesia, both general and regional anesthesia are used to correct anorectal anomalies. Among regional techniques, spinal and caudal anesthesia is most often used. The most effective anesthesia option for anorectal surgery is saddle anesthesia since it is accompanied by a significant decrease in the tone of the anal sphincter. Combined use of general anesthesia and caudal analgesia contributes to the reduction of intraoperative blood loss and early restoration of bowel functions.

Conclusion. Further research is needed to establish rapid post-operative recovery protocols for anorectal malformations in children.

About the Authors

Yu. S. Aleksandrovich
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Yury S. Aleksandrovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Pediatrics, Faculty of Postgraduate Training and Additional Professional Education, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation.

146, Al-Farabi St., Almaty, Kazakhstan, 050060



G. N. Alimkhanova
Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery
Kazakhstan

Gulshat N. Alimkhanova, Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery (Almaty), Head of Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care for Older Children.

146, Al-Farabi St., Almaty, Kazakhstan, 050060



K. V. Pshenisnov
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Pshenisnov, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Pediatrics, Faculty of Postgraduate Training and Additional Professional Education.

2, Litovskaya St., St. Petersburg, 194100



T. I. Akimenko
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatiana I. Akimenko, Assistant of Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Pediatrics, Faculty of Postgraduate Training and Additional Professional Education.

2, Litovskaya St., St. Petersburg, 194100



S. A. Razumov
Astana Medical University
Kazakhstan

Sergey A. Razumov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Independent Expert in Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Phone: +77013275762

49a, Beybitshilik St., Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 010000



References

1. Averin V.I., Ionov A.L., Karavaeva S.A. et al. Anorectal malformations in children (federal clinical guidelines). Detskaya Khirurgiya, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 29-35. (In Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/anorektalnye-malformatsii-u-detey-federalnye-klinicheskie-rekomendatsii.

2. Aleksandrovich Yu.S., Pshenisnov K.V. Pre-operative preparation to anesthesia in children. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2020, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 79‒ 94. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-3-79-94.

3. Alimkhanova G.N., Prometnoy D.V., Nafikov V.S. et al. Anesthesia for congenital malformations of the anorectal region in children. Meditsina: Teoriya I Praktika, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.) http://ojs3.gpmu.org/index.php/med-theory-and-practice/article/view/500.

4. Vydrych Yu.V., Demikova N.S., Filyushkin Yu.N. et al. Epidemiological, clinical and genetic characteristics of anorectal malformation (review). Eksperimentalnaya i Klinicheskaya Gastroenterologiya, 2016, vol. 5, pp. 58-64. (In Russ.) https://www.nogr.org/jour/article/view/199.

5. Mokrushina O.G., Shumikhin V.S., Levitskaya M.V. et al. Results of treatment of fifty children with persistent cloaca in one center. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Detskoy Khirurgii, Anesteziologii I Reanimatologii, 2021, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 315-323. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic985.

6. Alizadeh F., Heydari S.M., Nejadgashti R. Efectiveness of caudal epidural block on interaoperative blood loss during hypospadias repair: A randomized clinical trial. J. Pediatr. Urol., 2018, vol. 14, no. 420, pp. e1-420.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.03.025.

7. Ameh E.A., Seyi-Olajide J.O., Sholadoye T.T. Neonatal surgical care: a review of the burden, progress and challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. Paediatr. Int. Child Health, 2015, vol. 35, pp. 243–251. doi: 10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000033.

8. Badiee Z., Zandi H., Armanian A. et al. Premedication with intravenous midazolam for neonatal endotracheal intubation: A double blind randomized controlled trial. J. Res. Med. Sci., 2021, vol. 26, pp. 57. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_546_19.

9. Benka A.U., Pandurov M., Galambos I.F. et al. Efeitos do bloqueio peridural caudal em pacientes cirúrgicos pediátricos: estudo randomizado [Effects of caudal block in pediatric surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial]. Braz. J. Anesthesiol., 2020, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 97–103. Portuguese. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.003.

10. Brindle M.E., McDiarmid C., Short K. et al. Consensus guidelines for perioperative care in neonatal intestinal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World J. Surg., 2020, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2482–2492. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05530-1.

11. Conway J.A., Kharayat P., Sanders R.C.Jr. et al. National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and for the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI). Ketamine use for tracheal intubation in critically ill children is associated with a lower occurrence of adverse hemodynamic events. Crit. Care Med., 2020, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. e489-e497. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004314.

12. Dalens B., Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth. Analg., 1989, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 83‒89.

13. Danelli G., Berti M., Perotti V. et al. Temperature control and recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic or laparotomic colorectal surgery in patients receiving combined epidural/general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia. Anesth. Analg., 2002, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 467‒471, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00043.

14. Ecoffey C., Lacroix F., Giaufré E. et al. Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr. Anaesth., 2010, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1061‒1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03448.x.

15. Elsharydah A., Zuo L.W., Minhajuddin A. et al. Effects of epidural analgesia on recovery after open colorectal surgery. Proc. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent., 2017, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 255–258. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929608.

16. Fellmann C., Gerber A.C., Weiss M. Apnoea in a former preterm infant after caudal bupivacaine with clonidine for inguinal herniorrhaphy.

17. Paediatr. Anaesth., 2002, vol. 12, pp. 637‒640. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.

18. 00924.x.

19. Fuentes R., Cortínez L.I., Contreras V. et al. Propofol pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and its electroencephalographic interaction with remifentanil in children. Paediatr. Anaesth., 2018, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1078‒1086. doi: 10.1111/pan.13486.

20. Gómez-Chacón J., Encarnación J., Couselo M. et al. Ventajas de la analgesia epidural en cirugía mayor neonatal [Benefits of epidural analgesia in major neonatal surgery]. Cir. Pediatr., 2012, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 149‒154. PMID: 23480012.

21. Gustafsson U.O., Scott M.J., Hubner M. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J. Surg., 2019, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 659‒695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.

22. Hübner M., Blanc C., Roulin D. et al. Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Ann. Surg., 2015, vol. 261, no. 4, pp. 648‒653. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000838.

23. Jafar Al-Sa’adi M.H. Assessment of surgeon performed caudal block for anorectal surgery. Asian. J. Surg., 2019, vol. 42, pp. 240‒243. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.05.006.

24. Kokki H., Ylönen P., Laisalmi M. et al. Isobaric ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for spinal anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg., 2005, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 66‒70. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000140246.78944.A5.

25. Kumar P., Denson S.E., Mancuso T.J. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Section on anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Premedication for nonemergency endotracheal intubation in the neonate. Pediatrics, 2010, vol. 125, pp. 608–615. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2863.

26. Lawal T.A. Overview of anorectal malformations in Africa. Front Surg., 2019, vol. 5, pp. 6‒7. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00007.

27. Lin Z., Fang Y., Yan L. et al. General versus general anaesthesia combined with caudal block in laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through of Hirschsprung disease: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol., 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 209. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01431-5.

28. LyTorre D.V., Stephen Q.H. Pediatric ERAS: big ideas for the smallest patients. ASA Monitor., 2020, vol. 84, pp. 26-28. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pediatric-ERAS%3A-Big-Ideas-for-the-Smallest-Patients-Vidaurri-Hoang/14618408fe15a44960abc7a2906ec2a8f8630107.

29. Mansfield S.A., Woodroof J., Murphy A.J. et al. Does epidural analgesia really enhance recovery in pediatric surgery patients? Pediatr. Surg. Int., 2021, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1201‒1206. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04897-z.

30. Martin J. Regional anaesthesia in neonates, infants and children: An educational review. Eur. J. Anaesth., 2015, vol. 32, pp. 289‒297. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000239.

31. McPherson C., Ortinau C.M., Vesoulis Z. Practical approaches to sedation and analgesia in the newborn. J. Perinatol., 2021, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 383‒395. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00878-7.

32. Moselli N.M., Baricocchi E., Ribero D. et al. Debernardi F. Intraoperative epidural analgesia prevents the early proinflammatory response to surgical trauma. Results from a prospective randomized clinical trial of intraoperative epidural versus general analgesia. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2011, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2722‒2731. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1700-9.

33. Myles P.S., Leslie K., Chan M.T. et al. ANZCA Trials Group for the ENIGMA-II investigators. The safety of addition of nitrous oxide to general anaesthesia in at-risk patients having major non-cardiac surgery (ENIGMA-II): a randomised, single-blind trial. Lancet, 2014, vol. 384 (9952), pp. 1446‒1454. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60893-X.

34. Patel D. Epidural analgesia for children. Continuing education in

35. anaesthesia. Crit. Care Pain., 2006, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 63‒66. doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkl001.

36. Pereira e Silva Y., Gomez R.S., Marcatto J. de O. et al. Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal. Neonatal. Ed., 2007, vol. 92, no. 4, F293-F294. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.105262.

37. Ponde V. Recent trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Indian J. Anaesth., 2019, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 746‒753. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_502_19.

38. Sanghvi C., Dua A. Caudal Anesthesia. 2021 Oct 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022. PMID: 31869157. Caudal Anesthesia ‒ PubMed (nih.gov).

39. Sato M., Iida T., Kikuchi C., Sasakawa T. et al. Comparison of caudal ropivacaine-morphine and paravertebral catheter for major upper abdominal surgery in infants. Paediatr Anaesth., 2017, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 524‒530. doi: 10.1111/pan.13104.

40. Schletker J., Wiersch J., Ketzer J. et al. An overview of opioid usage and regional anesthesia for patients undergoing repair of anorectal malformation. Pediatr. Surg. Int., 2021, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 457‒460. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04841-7.

41. Shanthanna H., Singh B., Guyatt G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal block as compared to noncaudal regional techniques for inguinal surgeries in children. Biomed. Res. Int., 2014, no. 2014:890626. doi: 10.1155/2014/890626.

42. Shon Y.J., Huh J., Kang S.S. et al. Comparison of saddle, lumbar epidural and caudal blocks on anal sphincter tone: A prospective, randomized study. J. Int. Med. Res., 2016, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1061–1071. doi: 10.1177/0300060516659393.

43. Smits A., Thewissen L., Caicedo A. et al. Propofol dose-finding to reach optimal effect for (semi-)elective intubation in neonates. J. Pediatr., 2016, vol. 179, pp. 54–60.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.049.

44. Suresh S., Ecoffey C., Bosenberg A. et al. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Recommendations on Local Anesthetics and Adjuvants Dosage in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med., 2018, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 211–216. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000702.

45. Suresh S., Long J., Birmingham P.K. et al. Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database. Anesth. Analg., 2015, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 151–156. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446.

46. Swain A., Nag D.S., Sahu S. et al. Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World J. Clin. Cases, 2017, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 307–323. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v5.i8.307.

47. Teerlink C.C., Bernhisel R., Cannon-Albright L.A. et al. A genealogical assessment of familial clustering of anorectal malformations. J. Hum. Genet., 2018, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1029–1034. doi: 10.1038/s10038-018-0487-y.

48. Touloukian R.J., Wugmeister M., Pickett L.K. et al. Caudal anesthesia for neonatal anoperineal and rectal operations. Anesth. Analg., 1971, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 565–568.

49. Tsuchiya M. Regional anesthesia: advantages of combined use with general anesthesia and useful tips for improving nerve block technique with ultrasound technology. Current Topics in Anesthesiology, Riza Hakan Erbay, Intech Open. 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313539574_Regional_Anesthesia_Advantages_of_Combined_Use_with_General_Anesthesia_and_Useful_Tips_for_Improving_Nerve_Block_Technique_with_Ultrasound_Technology.

50. Vargas A., Sawardekar A., Suresh S. Updates on pediatric regional anesthesia safety data. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2019, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 649–652. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000768.

51. Walker B.J., Long J.B., Sathyamoorthy M. et al. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network Investigators. Complications in pediatric regional anesthesia: An analysis of more than 100,000 blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Anesthesiology, 2018, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 721–732. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002372.

52. Wiegele M., Marhofer P., Lönnqvist P.A. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br. J. Anaesth., 2019, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. pp. 509–517. (In Russ.) doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030.


Review

For citations:


Aleksandrovich Yu.S., Alimkhanova G.N., Pshenisnov K.V., Akimenko T.I., Razumov S.A. Anaesthesia in Correction of Anorectal Defects in Children. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2022;19(3):87-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-3-87-95



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5658 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8653 (Online)