Preview

Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION

Advanced search

Myocardial function after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with combined epidural and inhalation anesthesia

https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-5-6-14

Abstract

There are certain debates regarding epidural anesthesia (EA) and analgesia in cardiac surgery.

The objective: to evaluate functions of left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) function with echocardiography after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) using combined inhalation and epidural anesthesia.

Subjects and methods: 68 patients were randomized into 2 groups, differed by anesthesia techniques. In Group 1 (GA, n = 34), we used general anesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl, while in Group 2 (CA, n = 34) – its combination with epidural anesthesia by 0.5% ropivacaine followed by infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after OPCAB. Parameters of cardiac performance and ventricular function were assessed by echocardiography.

Results. There were no differences in systolic function of LV, RV, diastolic function of LV between the groups. The difference in the left atrial strain was revealed before hospital discharge and made 18.0 (14.5‒21.5) % in CA Group and 24.0 (18.0–26.0)% in GA Group (p = 0.028).

Conclusions. The use of epidural anesthesia and analgesia is not associated with clinically significant changes in inotropic and lusitropic functions of LV as well as RV systolic function after OPCAB.

About the Authors

K. V. Paromov
E. E. Volosevich First Municipal Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Paromov Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physician of Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care

1, Suvorova St., Arkhangelsk, 163001
Phone: +7 (8182) 63‒29‒56 



D. A. Volkov
E. E. Volosevich First Municipal Clinical Hospital; Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Volkov Physician of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Department

1, Suvorova St., Arkhangelsk, 163001
Phone: +7 (8182) 63‒27‒24 



N. V. Nizovtsev
E. E. Volosevich First Municipal Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Nikolay V. Nizovtsev Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physician of Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care

1, Suvorova St., Arkhangelsk, 163001
Phone: +7 (8182) 63‒29‒56 



M. Yu. Kirov
E. E. Volosevich First Municipal Clinical Hospital; Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mikhail Yu. Kirov Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, PhD

1, Suvorova St., Arkhangelsk, 163001
Phone: +7 (8182) 63‒29‒86 



References

1. Kolevatova L.А., Kornienko А.N., Ketskalo M.V. Impact of high epidural block on left ventricular myocardial function after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Obschaya Reanimatologiya, 2006, vol. 2 (1), pp. 54-58. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15360/1813-9779-2006-1-54-58.

2. Kornienko E.А., Kornienko А.N. Dynamics of myocardial contractility in the patients with unstable angina after sympathetic blockade. Vestn. Novykh Meditsinskikh Tekhnologiy, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 173-178. (In Russ.) doi: 10.12737/19739.

3. Abbas A.E., Abdulla R.K., Aggrawal A. et al. A novel echocardiographic hemodynamic classification of heart failure based on stroke volume index and left atrial pressure. Echocardiography, 2017, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1417-1425. doi:10.1111/echo13642.

4. Arnold J.R., McCann G.P. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: application and practical considerations for the general cardiologist. Heart, 2020, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 174-181. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314856.

5. Bartelemy R., Roy X., Javanainen T. et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices of right ventricular systolic function and ejection fraction obtained with continuous thermodilution in critically ill patients. Crit. Care, 2019, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 312, doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2582-7.

6. D'alto M., Dimopoulos K., Coghlan J.G. et al. Right heart catheterisation for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension: controversies and practical issues. Heart Fail. Clin., 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 467-477. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2018.03.011.

7. French B., Kramer C.M. Mechanisms of post-infarct left ventricular remodeling. Drug. Discov. Today Dis. Mech., 2007, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 185-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmec.2007.12.006.

8. Godon A., Richter A., Cederhoim I. et al. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in refractory angina pectoris. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2019, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 515-522. doi: 10.1111/aas.13291.

9. Gullo A.L., Rodriguez-Carrio J., Gallizzi R. et al. Speckle tracking echocardiography as a new diagnostic tool for an assessment of cardiovascular disease in rheumatic patients. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 2020, Pii:S0033-0620(20)30057-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.005.

10. Hemmerling T.M., Cyr S., Terrasini N. Epidural catheterization in cardiac surgery: the 2012 risk assessment. Ann. Card. Anaesth., 2013, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 169‒177. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.114237.

11. Jacobsen C.J. High thoracic epidural in cardiac anesthesia: a review. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anest., 2015, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 38-48. doi: 10.1177/1089253214548764.

12. Jakobsen C.J., Bhavsar R., Nielsen D.V. et al. High thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. Part 1 – high thoracic eprdural anesthesia improves cardiac performance in cardiac surgery patients. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth., 2012, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1039-1047. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.05.007.

13. Jardin F., Vieillard-Baron A. Right ventricle function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respiratory settings. Intens. Care Med., 2003, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1426-1434.

14. Landoni G., Isella F., Greco M. et al. Benefits and risks of epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. Br. J. Anaesth., 2015, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 25-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev201.

15. Li Q-S., Li F-Q. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on plasma cAMP and cGMP levels in patients with heart failure. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2013, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 217.

16. Li X.Q., Tan W.F., Wang J. et al. The effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on oxygenation and pulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation: an meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol., 2015, vol. 15, pp. 166, doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0142-5.

17. Licker M., Spiliopoulos A., Tschopp J.M. Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on cardiovascular autonomic control after thoracic surgery. Br. J. Anaesth., 2003, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 525-531. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg212.

18. Marwick T.H. Ejection fraction Pros and Cons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2018, vol. 72, no. 19, pp. 2360-2379.

19. Marwick T.H., Shah S.J., Thomas J.D. Myocardial strain in the assessment of patients with heart failure: a review. JAMA Cardiol., 2019, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 287-294. DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0052.

20. Mohamad M.F., Mahammad M.A., Helta D.F. et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia reduced myocardial injury in ischemic patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. J. Pain Res., 2017, vol. 10, pp. 887-895. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S122918.

21. Nagueh S.F., Smiseth O.A., Appleton C.P. et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr., 2016, vol. 29, pp. 277-314.

22. Nielsen A.B., Skaarup K.G., Lassen M.C.H. et al. Usefulness of left atrial speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting recurrence of atrial fibrellation after radiofrequency ablation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 2020, DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01828-2.

23. Nielsen D.V., Bhavsar R., Greisen J. et al. High thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. Part 2 – high thoracic epidural analgesia does not reduce time in or improve quality of recovery in the intensive care unit. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth., 2012, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1048-1054. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.05.008.

24. Ozcan S., Ozer A.B., Yasar M.A. et al. Effects of combined general anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia on cytokine response in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Niger. J. Clin. Pract., 2016, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 436-442. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.183308.

25. Park J.H., Marwick T.H. Use and limitation of E/e’ to assess left ventricle filling pressure by echocardiography. J. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound., 2011, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 169-173.

26. Pirinen J., Jarvinen V., Martinez-Majander N. et al. Left atrial dynamics is altered in young adults with cryptogenic ischemic stroke: A case-control study utilizing advanced echocardiography. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 2020, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. e014578. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014578.

27. Prijic S., Buchhorn R. Mechanisms of beta-blockers action in patients with heart failure. Rev. Recent. Clin. Trials, 2014, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 58-60. DOI:10.2174/1574887109666140908125402.

28. Sellke F., Nido P., Scott Swanson S. Sabiston & Spencer surgery of the chest. 9th Ed. Philadelphia, PA, Elsevier. 2016, pp. 1032.

29. Vaidya Y., Cavanaugh S.M., Dhamoon A.S. Myocardial Stunning and hibernation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls publishing, 2020. NBK537026.

30. van Garse L., Gelsomino S., Luca F. et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate before and folloing restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation evaluated by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 2013, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 534-543. doi: 10/1093/ehjci/jes206.

31. Wijeysundera D.N., Beattie W.S., Austin P.C. et al. Epidural anesthesia and survival after intermediate to high risk non-cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. Lancet, 2008, vol. 372, pp. 562-569. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61121-6.

32. Wink J., Veering B. T., Aarts L. P. et al. Effects of increasing age on the haemodinamic responce to thoracic epidural anaesthesia. EJA, 2014, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 597-605. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000125.


Review

For citations:


Paromov K.V., Volkov D.A., Nizovtsev N.V., Kirov M.Yu. Myocardial function after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with combined epidural and inhalation anesthesia. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2020;17(5):6-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-5-6-14



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5658 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8653 (Online)