Preview

Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии

Расширенный поиск

СТАНДАРТИЗАЦИЯ ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ И ИСХОДОВ ОПЕРАТИВНОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ

https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-4-53-66

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Необходимость проведения больших рандомизированных клинических исследований эффективнос­ти медицинских вмешательств в периоперационном периоде требует определения «конечных точек» (end point) с использованием универсальной классификации возможных осложнений и неблагоприятных исходов. Для этого под эгидой European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) и European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) были разработаны Стандарты определения и использования критериев степени тяжести состояния для исследования клинической эффективности в периоперационном периоде. Данные стандарты позволят более точно проводить сравнительный анализ данных, оперировать исследователям и клиницистам стандартными понятиями и помогут интеграции отечественных институтов в между­народную научную деятельность.

Об авторах

В. В. Лихванцев
ГБУЗ МО «МОНИКИ им. М. Ф. Владимирского», г. Москва
Россия

доктор медицинских наук, профессор, руководитель отделения реаниматологии



Ю. В. Скрипкин
ГБУЗ МО «МОНИКИ им. М. Ф. Владимирского», г. Москва
Россия

заведующий отделением реанимации и интенсивной терапии № 1

 



Ж. С. Филипповская
ГБУЗ МО «МОНИКИ им. М. Ф. Владимирского», г. Москва
Россия

заведующая отделением кардиореанимации



Д. А. Жгулёв
ГБУЗ МО «МОНИКИ им. М. Ф. Владимирского», г. Москва
Россия

врач отделения реанимации и интенсивной терапии

 



Список литературы

1. American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2014. http:// acsnsqip.org. [Accessed 23 June 2014].

2. Bennett-Guerrero E., Welsby I., Dunn T. J. et al. The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery // Anesth. Analg. - 1999. - Vol. 89. - P. 514-519.

3. Bergeron N., Dubois M. J., Dumont M. et al. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool // Int. Care Med. - 2001. Vol. 27. - P. 859-864.

4. Borthwick E., Ferguson A. Perioperative acute kidney injury: risk factors, recognition, management, and outcomes // BMJ. - 2010. - Vol. 341. - P. 3365.

5. Botto F., Alonso-Coello P., Chan M. T. et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes // Anesthesiology. - 2014. - Vol. 120. - P. 564-578.

6. Bruce J., Krukowski Z. H., Al-Khairy G. et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery // Br. J. Surg. - 2001. - Vol. 88. - P. 1157-1168.

7. Canet J., Gallart L., Gomar C. et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort // Anesthesiology. - 2010. - Vol. 113. - P. 1338-1350.

8. Dindo D., Breitenstein S., Hahnloser D. et al. Kinetics of D-dimer after general surgery // Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. - 2009. - Viol. 20. - P. 347-352.

9. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey // Ann. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 240. - P. 205-213.

10. Ely E. W., Inouye S. K., Bernard G. R. et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) // JAMA. - 2001. - Vol. 286. - P. 2703-2710.

11. Force A. D. T., Ranieri V. M., Rubenfeld G. D. et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition // JAMA. - 2012. - Vol. 307. - P. 2526-2533.

12. Gornall B. F., Myles P. S., Smith C. L. et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review // Br. J. Anaesth. - 2013. - Vol. 111. - P. 161-169.

13. Grocott M. P., Browne J. P., van der Meulen J. et al. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery // J. Clin. Epidemiol. - 2007. - Vol. 60. - P. 919-928.

14. Horan T. C., Andrus M., Dudeck M. A. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of healthcare-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting // Am. J. Infect. Control. - 2008. - Vol. 36. - P. 309-332.

15. Jacobs I. Nadkarni V., Bahr J. et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa) // Circulation. - 2004. - Vol. 110. - P. 3385-3397.

16. Jammer I., Wickboldt N., Sander M. et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. - 2015. - Vol. 32, № 2. - Р. 88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118. PubMed PMID: 25058504.

17. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury // Nephron. Clin. Pract. - 2012. - Vol. 120. - P. 179-184.

18. Mehta R. L., Kellum J. A., Shah S. V. et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury // Crit. Care. - 2007. - Vol. 11. - P. R31.

19. Myles P. S., Weitkamp B., Jones K. et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40 // Br. J. Anaesth. - 2000. - Vol. 84. - P. 11-15.

20. Peel A. L., Taylor E. W. Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. - 1991. - Vol. 73. - P. 385-388.

21. Porembka M. R., Hall B. L., Hirbe M., Strasberg S. M. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the Accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program // J. Am. Coll. Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 210. - P. 286-298.

22. Ramirez J. A., McIntosh A. G., Strehlow R., et al. Definition, incidence, risk factors, and prevention of paralytic ileus following radical cystectomy: a systematic review // Eur. Urol. - 2013. - Vol. 64. - P. 588-597.

23. Reintam A., Parm P., Kitus R. et al. Gastrointestinal failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study // Crit. Care. - 2008. - Vol. 12. - P. R90.

24. Royse C. F., Newman S., Chung F. et al. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the postoperative quality recovery scale // Anesthesiology. - 2010. - Vol. 113. - P. 892-905.

25. Sabate S., Mases A., Guilera N. et al. Incidence and predictors of major perioperative adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in noncardiac surgery // Br. J. Anaesth. - 2011. - Vol. 107. - P. 879-890.

26. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding, Guideline No. 105. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2008. http://www.sign.ac.uk/ guidelines/fulltext/105/index.html. [Accessed 23 June 2014].

27. Stark P. A., Myles P. S., Burke J. A. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15 // Anesthesiology. - 2013. - Vol. 118. - P. 1332-1340.

28. Strasberg S. M., Linehan D. C., Hawkins W. G. The Accordion severity grading system of surgical complications // Ann. Surg. - 2009. - Vol. 250. - P. 177-186.

29. Testa M. A., Simonson D. C. Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1996. - Vol. 334. - P. 835-840.

30. Thygesen K., Alpert J. S., Jaffe A. S. et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction // Eur. Heart. J. - 2012. - Vol. 33. - P. 2551-2567.

31. Üstün T. B. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

32. Valles J., Guilera M., Briones Z. et al. Validity of the Spanish 8-item short-form generic health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in surgical patients: a population-based study // Anesthesiology. - 2010. - Vol. 112. - P. 1164-1174.

33. van Bree S. H., Bemelman W. A., Hollmann M. W. et al. Identification of clinical outcome measures for recovery of gastrointestinal motility in postoperative ileus // Ann. Surg. - 2014. - Vol. 259. - P. 708-714.

34. Ware J. Jr., Kosinski M., Keller S. D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity // Med. Care. - 1996. - Vol. 34. - P. 220-233.

35. Ware J. E. Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000. - Vol. 25. - P. 3130-3139.


Для цитирования:


Лихванцев В.В., Скрипкин Ю.В., Филипповская Ж.С., Жгулёв Д.А. СТАНДАРТИЗАЦИЯ ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ И ИСХОДОВ ОПЕРАТИВНОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ. Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2015;12(4):53-66. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-4-53-66

For citation:


Likhvantsev V.V., Skripkin Y.V., Filippovskaya Z.S., Zhgulyov D.A. STANDARDIZATION OF COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF SURGERY TREATMENT. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2015;12(4):53-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-4-53-66

Просмотров: 53


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5658 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8653 (Online)