COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF EPIDURAL CAVITY PARACENTESIS THROUGH MEDIAN AND PARAMEDIAN ACCESS
https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-4-3-7
Abstract
The technique has been developed to evaluate the safest conditions of epidural anesthesia depending on the level of paracentesis, access and needle size. The technique is offered for calculation of the safe area allowing evaluating the chances of adverse events depending on the applied access.
About the Authors
V. V. Kobrina
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. P. Kobrin
Children Infectious Hospital no. 1
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Glusсhenko
N. N. Petrov Oncology Research Institute, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Gluschenko V.A. Vybor i obosnovanie metodov neyroaksialnykh anesteziy pri operatsiyakh na organakh bryushnoy polosti i nizhnikh konechnostyakh. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. [The selection and justification of neuro-axial anesthesia when performing surgery in the abdomen and lower extremities. Doct. Diss.]. I.I. Mechnikov State Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, 2009, 20 p.
2. Kabylbekov A.K. Profilaktika nekotorykh oslozhneniy regionarnoy anestezii pri kesarevom sechenii. Diss. kand. med. nauk. [Prevention of some complications of regional anesthesia in Caesarean operation. Cand. Diss.]. St. Petersburg State Pediatric Academy, St. Petersburg, 2008, 23 p.
3. Koryachkin V.A. Neyroaksial'nye blokady. [Neuro-axial blocks]. St. Petersburg, ELBI-SPb Publ., 2013, 544 p.
4. M. Mulroy. Mestnaya anesteziya. (Russ. ed.: M. Mulroy. Regional Anesthesia). Moscow, Binom. Laboratoriya Znaniy Publ., 302 p.
5. Ramfell D.P., Nil D.M., Viskoumi K.M. Regionarnaya anesteziya. (Russ. Ed.: Ramfell D.P., Nil D.M., Viskoumi K.M. Regional anesthesia). Moscow, MEDpress-Inform Publ., 2007, 272 p.
6. Fedosov I. I., Sgibnev V. I., Butenko N. G. et al. Complication of epidural anesthesia. Tez. i dokl. VII Vserossiyskogo s"ezda anesteziologov i reanimatologov. [Abst. book and presentations of the VII All-Russian Conference of Anesthesiologists and Emergency Physicians]. Omsk, 2002, pp. 248. (In Russ.)
7. Finucane B.T. Complications of regional anesthesia. 2007, 506 p.
8. Horlocer T.T., Wedel D.J. Neurologic complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med., 2000, vol. 25, pp. 83-98.
9. Kopacz D.J., Neal J.M., Pollock J.E. The regional anesthesia «Learning Curve». What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg. Anesthesia, 1996, vol. 21, pp. 182-190.
10. Kortrad C., Shuepfer G., Wietlisbach M. et al. Learning manual skills in anesmesiology. Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth. Analg., 1998, vol. 86, pp. 635-639.
Review
For citations:
Kobrina V.V., Kobrin V.P., Glusсhenko V.A. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF EPIDURAL CAVITY PARACENTESIS THROUGH MEDIAN AND PARAMEDIAN ACCESS. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2015;12(4):3-7. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-4-3-7
Email this article 