COMBINED ANESTHESIA IN PULMONARY RESECTION
https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-1-32-39
Abstract
In order to improve outcomes of surgical treatment of thoracic diseases, the peri-operative protection is to be constantly enhanced. Goal: to assess the effect of combined anesthesia with thoracic epidural analgesia in the peri-operative period on hemodynamics and respiratory exchange during radical pulmonary surgery. Subjects and methods. The prospective randomized study was performed aiming to assess the effect of various options of anesthesia in 46 patients who had planned radical pulmonary surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 23) had combined anesthesia. Analgesia was provided through segmental epidural block on the level of Th4 ‒Th5 by intermittent bolus dosing of 0.75% solution of ropivacaine (0.7-0.8 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1.3-1.5 mcg/kg), and during the surgery, the mixture of 0.02% solution of ropivacaine and fentanyl (4 mcg/kg) was continuously infused at the rate of 4-6 ml/h. In Group 2 (n = 23), analgesia was provided by infusions of fentanyl, epidural analgesia was used in the post-operative period as a component of multi-modal post-operative pain relief. In both groups, the cortical component was provided by the low-flow inhalation of sevoflurane under BIS monitoring. Pipecuronium bromide solution was intermittently administered in order to provide muscle relaxation. Conclusion. The positive impact on hemodynamics and respiratory exchange was observed when using combined anesthesia based on thoracic epidural analgesia and inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane.
About the Authors
M. M. Orlov
Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiologist and Emergency Physician
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiologist and Emergency Physician
E. V. Nedashkovskiy
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
A. E. Rakhov
Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
Russian Federation
Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
E. A. Malyshkin
Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department
N. V. Maltseva
Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Anesthesiologist and Emergency Physician
Russian Federation
Anesthesiologist and Emergency Physician
References
1. Vyzhigina M.А., Mizikov V.M., Sadrikov V.А. et al. Modern specific features of the respiratory support in thoracic surgery. Traditional problems and innovative solutions (experience of more than 2,000 anesthesias) Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya, 2013, no. 2, pp. 34-41. (In Russ.)
2. Vyzhigina M.А., Ryabova O.S., Kulagina T.Yu. et al. The impact of combined anesthesia with isoflurane on the adaptive mechanisms when changing the ventilation conditions in thoracic surgery. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya, 2006, no. 5, pp. 49-58. (In Russ.)
3. Gasanov F.D., Аslanov А.А., Muradov N.F. et al. The specific course of combined anesthesia with an epidural component depending on the type of vegetative nervous system. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya, 2016. vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23-27. (In Russ.)
4. Gombalevskiy D.V., Kosinskiy I.G., Bordakov V.N. et al. Principles of the fast-track concept in thoracic surgery. Voennaya Meditsina, 2016, no. 4, pp. 92-98. (In Russ.)
5. Gorobets E.S., Gruzdev V.E., Zotov А.V. et al. Multi-modal combined anesthesia in traumatic surgeries. Obschaya Reanimatologiya, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 45-50. (In Russ.)
6. G. Edward Morgan, Maged S. Mikhail. Klinicheskaya Anesteziologiya: book 2nd. (Russ. Ed.: G. Edward Morgan, Maged S. Mikhail. Clinical Anesthesiology). St. Petersburg, Izdatelstvo BINOM – Nevskiy Dialekt Publ., 2000, 366 p., (pp. 164-191).
7. Konoplya А.I., Sumin S.А., Gavrilyuk V.P. et al. Correlations between immune and metabolic disorders when using various methods of multi-component general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya, 2016, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 417-421. (In Russ.)
8. Lebedinsky K.M. Krovoobrashhenie i anesteziya. Otsenka i korrektsiya sistemnoy gemodinamiki vo vremya operatsii i anestezii. [Blood circulation and anesthesia. Evaluation and assessment of system hemodynamics during surgery and anesthesia]. K.M. Lebedinskiy, eds., St. Petersburg, Chelovek Publ., 2012, pp. 514-537.
9. Rukovodstvo po anesteziologii i reanimatologii. [Guideline on anesthesia and intensive care]. Yu.S. Polushin, eds., St. Peterburg, ELBI-SPb Publ., 2004, pp. 475-492.
10. Utkin M.M. Central hemodynamics in thoracic surgeries. Modern technologies in anesthesiology and intensive care. Materialy kongressa anesteziologov-reanimatologov Tsentralnogo federalnogo okruga. [Materials of the Congress of Anesthesiologists and Emergency Physicians of the Central Federal District]. 2003, pp. 58-59. (In Russ.)
11. Bromage P.R. Physiology and pharmacology of epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1967, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 592-622.
12. Defosse J., Schieren M., Böhmer A. et al. A Germany-wide survey on anaesthesia in thoracic surgery. Anaesthesist., 2016, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 449-457.
13. Elsharydah A., Williams T.M., Rosero E.B. Effect of post-operative epidural analgesia on the rate of inpatient falls after major upper abdominal and thoracic surgery in the United States: Evaluation on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2007‒2011. Anesthesiology, 2014, vol. 120, pp. 551-563.
14. Gayraud G., Bastien O., Taheri H. et al. A French survey on the practice of analgesia for thoracic surgery. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim., 2013, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 684-690.
15. Kammerer T., Speck E., von Dossow V. Anesthesia in thoracic surgery. Anaesthesist, 2016, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 397-412.
16. Kozian A., Schilling T., Hachenberg T. Non-analgetic effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 2005, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29-34.
17. Muehling B.M., Halter G.L., Schelzig H. et al. Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2008, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 174-180.
18. Ozcan P.E., Sentürk M., Sungur Ulke Z. et al. Effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on pulmonary venous admixture and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 2007, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1117-1122.
19. Petersen R.H., Holbek B.L., Hansen H.J., Kehlet H. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery – taking a step into the future. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2017, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 694-695.
20. Shelley B., Macfie A., Kinsella J. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a survey of UK practice. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth., 2011, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1014-1017.
21. http://www.postoppain.org/sections/?root_id=15894§ion=2
Review
For citations:
Orlov M.M., Nedashkovskiy E.V., Rakhov A.E., Malyshkin E.A., Maltseva N.V. COMBINED ANESTHESIA IN PULMONARY RESECTION. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2018;15(1):32-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-1-32-39
Email this article 