CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK IN MEDICAL UNITS OF ST. PETERSBURG
https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2016-13-5-88-94
Abstract
The letter contains comments on the draft clinical recommendations for diagnostics and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in medical units of St. Petersburg, prepared by St. Petersburg Society of Sepsis Specialists (www.spbsepsis.ru). The number of principal comments has been stated and the opinion is expressed that the use of publication of these recommendations in the present form is doubtful.
About the Author
V. A. Rudnov
Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Toxicology Department, Member of Editorial Board of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care News Journal, Moderator of the Working Group of Russian Association of Surgical Infections Specialists on Sepsis: Definition, Etiopathogenesis, Clinical and Diagnostic Concept
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Toxicology Department, Member of Editorial Board of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care News Journal, Moderator of the Working Group of Russian Association of Surgical Infections Specialists on Sepsis: Definition, Etiopathogenesis, Clinical and Diagnostic Concept
References
1. Sepsis: klassifikatsiya, kliniko-diagnosticheskaya kontseptsiya i lecheniye. [Sepsis: classification, clinical and diagnostic concept and treatment]. Ed. by Gelfand, Moscow, OOO Meditsinskoye informatsionnoye agentstvo Publ., 2016. 404 p. (In Russ.)
2. Rudnov V.А., Kulabukhov V.V. Sepsis-3: updated main definitions, potential problems and next practical steps. Vestnik Anasteziol. i Reanimatol., 2016, no. 4, pp. 3-18. (In Russ.)
3. Rudnov V.А., Kulabukhov V.V. Evolving understanding of sepsis: the ongoing story. Infeksii v Khirurgii, 2015, no. 2, pp. 6-10. (In Russ.)
4. Binter et al. How is intensive care reimbursed? A review of eight European countries. Annals Intensive Care, 2013, vol. 3, pp. 37.
5. Bone R.C. Тoward an Epidemiology and Natural History of SIRS. JAMA,1992, vol. 268, pp. 3452-3455.
6. Oda S., Aibiki M., Ikeda T. et al. The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis. J. Crit. Care, 2014, no. 2, pp. 55.
7. Reinhart K., Brunkhorst F., Bone H.G. et al. Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI). Germ. Med. Science, 2010, vol. 8, pp. 1-86.
8. Sartelli M., Malangoni M., May A. et al. World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for management of skin and soft tissue infections. World J. Emergency Surgery, 2014, no. 9, pp. 57.
9. Seymour C.W., Liu V.X., Iwashyna T.J. et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 762-774.
10. Shankar-Hari M., Phillips G., Levy M. et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 775-787.
11. Singer M., Deuschman C.S., Seymour C.W. et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 801-810.
12. Wacker C., Prkno A., Brunkhorst F. et al. Procalitonin as diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Inf. Dis., 2013, vol. 13, pp. 426-435.
Review
For citations:
Rudnov V.A. CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK IN MEDICAL UNITS OF ST. PETERSBURG. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2016;13(5):88-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2016-13-5-88-94
Email this article 