Experience of using composite Z-score to assess delayed cognitive recovery in elderly patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer under intravenous or inhalation anesthesia. A prospective observational pilot study
https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-1-16-23
Abstract
Introduction. Perioperative cognitive disorders (POCD) represents a risk for elderly patients. Currently, there is no uniform and standardized methodology for the identification of POCD in the existing literature. Additionally, there is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal anesthetic option for geriatric patients.
The objective was to compare the incidence of delayed cognitive recovery depending on the main component of anesthesia in patients operated for colorectal cancer using composite Z-scores.
Materials and Methods. The study cohort comprised 31 patients who underwent surgical treatment for colorectal cancer under inhalation or intravenous anesthesia. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age over 60 years, planned surgical intervention of more than 180 minutes, absence of neurodegenerative, psychiatric diseases, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), diabetes mellitus in the anamnesis, and compliance with ASA class II or III. Neuropsychological testing was conducted preoperatively and on the fourth or fifth postoperative day. Delayed cognitive recovery was defined as a decrease in the composite Z-score of more than one standard deviation (SD) in comparison to the preoperative assessment.
Results. Delayed cognitive recovery in the group where sevoflurane was the main component exhibited in two patients (12.5%). In contrast, this complication was not observed in the group where propofol was the main component (p = 0.484). When using propofol, the delta of the composite Z-score was statistically significantly better – 0.306 [0.078; 0.484] than when using sevoflurane – –0.121 [-0.556; 0.022] (p = 0.001), which indicated a faster recovery of cognitive functions in the postoperative period.
Conclusion. The results of neuropsychological tests on patients who underwent surgical interventions with propofol as the main component were more similar to the results of preoperative assessments. This suggests a faster recovery of cognitive function in the postoperative period.
About the Authors
I. N. DushinRussian Federation
Dushin Ivan N., Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
A. A. Tetenich
Russian Federation
Tetenich Alexander A., Resident Physician, Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
M. O. Kazantceva
Russian Federation
Kazantceva Marina O., Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
A. A. Kotov
Russian Federation
Kotov Alexandr A., Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
A. V. Emelkina
Russian Federation
Emelkina Anna V., Resident Physician, Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
R. I. Haustov
Russian Federation
Haustov Roman I., Resident Physician, Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 1
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
E. N. Savina
Russian Federation
Savina Elizaveta N., Intensivist of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 2
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
V. V. Subbotin
Russian Federation
Subbotin Valery V., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Center
1, build. 1, Novogireevskaya str., Moscow, 111394
References
1. Aleksandrovich Y. S., Akimenko T. I., Pshenisnov K. V. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction – is it a problem for the anesthesiologist-intensivist? Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2019, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5–11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2019-16-4-5-11.
2. Berikashvili L. B., Kadantseva K. K., Ermokhina N. V., Likhvantsev V. V. Postoperative Neurocognitive Disorders: the Legacy of Almost 400 Years of History (Review). General Reanimatology, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 29–42. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2023-4-29-42.
3. Bogolepova A. N. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2022, vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 7–11. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20221220817.
4. Voytsekhovskiy D. V., Averyanov D. A., Schegolev A. V., Svistov D. V. Effect of deep anesthesia on development of post-operative cognitive dysfunction. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2018, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–9. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-1-5-9.
5. Gubaydullin R. R., Mikhaylov E. V., Kulakov V. V. Senile asthenia: clinical aspects of the perioperative period and anesthesia. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-2-12-19.
6. Zabolotskikh I. B., Gorobets E. S., Grigoryev E. V. et al. Perioperative management of elderly and senile patients. Recommendations. Annals of Critical Care, 2022, vol. 3, pp. 7–26. https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2022-3-7-26.
7. Zozulya M. V., Lenkin A. I., Kurapeev I. S. et al. Postoperative cognitive disorders: the pathogenesis, methods of prevention and treatment (literature review). Anesteziologiya I Reanimatologiya, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 25–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology201903125.
8. Moroz V. V., Dolgikh V. T., Karpitskaya S. A. Impact of general anesthesia and antioxidants on cognitive, static and locomotor functions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. General Reanimatology, 2022, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 4–11. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2022-2-4-11.
9. Polushin Yu. S., Polushin A. Yu., Yukina G. Yu., Kozhemyakina M. V. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction – what we know and where we go. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2019, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–28. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2019-16-1-19-28.
10. Subbotin V. V., Dushin I. N., Kamnev S. A., Аntipov A. Yu. Certain aspects of using Z-score to assess cognitive disorders. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2020, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 25–30. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-5-25-30.
11. Andrade C. Z Scores, standard scores, and composite test scores explained. Indian J Psychol Med, 2021, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 555–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211046525.
12. Evered L., Silbert B., Knopman D. S. et al. Nomenclature consensus working grouP. recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018. Anesthesiology, 2018, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002334.
13. Hou R., Wang H., Chen L. et al. POCD in patients receiving total knee replacement under deep vs light anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. e00910. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.910.
14. Kampman J. M., Hermanides J., Hollmann M. W. et al. Mortality and morbidity after total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, vol. 72, pp. 102636 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102636.
15. Kornak J., Fields J., Kremers W. et al. ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium. Nonlinear Z-score modeling for improved detection of cognitive abnormality. Alzheimers Dement (Amst), 2019, vol. 11, pp. 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.08.003.
16. Moller J. T., Cluitmans P., Rasmussen L. S. et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators. International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Lancet, 1998, vol. 351, pp. 857–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07382-0.
17. Sinderen K., Schwarte L. A., Schober P. Diagnostic criteria of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a focused systematic review. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2020, vol. 2020, pp. 7384394. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7384394.
18. Weinstein A. M., Gujral S., Butters M. A. et al. Diagnostic precision in the detection of mild cognitive impairment: a comparison of two approaches. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2022, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2021.04.004.
19. Xiao M. Z., Liu C. X., Zhou L. G. et al. Postoperative delirium, neuroinflammation, and influencing factors of postoperative delirium: A review. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. e32991. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032991.
Review
For citations:
Dushin I.N., Tetenich A.A., Kazantceva M.O., Kotov A.A., Emelkina A.V., Haustov R.I., Savina E.N., Subbotin V.V. Experience of using composite Z-score to assess delayed cognitive recovery in elderly patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer under intravenous or inhalation anesthesia. A prospective observational pilot study. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2025;22(1):16-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-1-16-23