- » Aim and Scope
- » Section Policies
- » Publication Frequency
- » Open Access Policy
- » Archiving
- » Peer-Review
- » Indexation
- » Publishing Ethics
- » Founder
- » Author fees
- » Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- » Plagiarism detection
- » Preprint and postprint Policy
- » Advertising in the magazine
Aim and Scope
Goals: to facilitate development of the Russian anesthesiology and intensive care
Objectives:
1. Promote professional development of researchers, doctors, teachers of medical universities and training institutions.
2. Review issues related to the efficiency of medicamentous and non-medicamentous methods of intensive treatment of patients in the critical state, feasibility, and efficiency of new technologies.
3. Present results of clinical trials, clinical follow-up, make practicing doctors aware of the latest achievements in research and practice of anesthesiology and intensive care.
4. Discuss new trends in the development of anesthesiology and intensive care, and ways to enhance the efficiency of medical education, inform readers about results of the Russian and international scientific fora.
5. Improve skills of writing manuscripts, planning, research and summarizing results of research, using principles of the evidence-based medicine.
6. Expand opportunities to disseminate and index research materials, providing maximum dissemination of the publications in the community of researchers.
7. Share experience and knowledge with other medical professionals.
8. Promote training of anesthesiologists and reanimatologists complying with legal norms and professional ethics.
9. Strengthen and develop professional communication between anesthesiologists and reanimatologists and medical units, providing anaesthesiologic and emergency care.
Section Policies
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Publication Frequency
6 issues per year
Open Access Policy
Update date: 04.10.2024
The journal provides direct open access to its content based on the following principle: free open access to research results contributes to an increase in global knowledge exchange. The Open Access Policy complies with the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) and means that articles are publicly available on the Internet, which allows all users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full texts of these articles, scan them for indexing, transfer as data for software or use them for any other legitimate purpose without financial, legal or technical barriers, except those that are inseparable from gaining access to the Internet itself. For more information, refer to the Budapest Declaration (https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/)"
Archiving
- Russian State Library (RSL)
- National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)
Peer-Review
Update date: 04.10.2024
All scientific articles submitted to the editorial board of the journal "Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation" undergo mandatory double-blind review (the reviewer does not know the authors of the manuscript, the authors of the manuscript do not know the reviewers).
- The examination of the article is carried out by the executive secretary of the journal for compliance with the basic provisions of the requirements for publications approved by the editorial board of the journal. Articles that are not designed in accordance with the requirements for publication, the authors of which refuse to technically refine the article, are not allowed to be reviewed.
- The review of articles is carried out by members of the editorial board, as well as invited reviewers – leading experts in the relevant branch of medicine in Russia and other countries. The article is sent to two experts for evaluation, and if there are disagreements, an additional expert is involved. Preference is given to external review. The decision on the choice of a reviewer for the examination of the article is made by the editor-in-chief, the scientific editor. The review period is 2-8 weeks, but it can be extended at the request of reviewers and authors. The review is carried out by a specialist of the appropriate profile, who does not have scientific, financial or any other relationship with the authors of the article and the editorial board of the journal. The review of articles is carried out on a voluntary and gratuitous basis. The review procedure is confidential. Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts sent to them are the intellectual property of the authors and relate to information that is not subject to disclosure. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscript for their own needs. Violation of confidentiality is possible only in the case of a statement about the unreliability or falsification of materials.
- When choosing a reviewer, the editorial board takes into account potential conflicts of interest: the reviewer cannot be a supervisor, subordinate or employer of the author, co-author of previous articles, relative of the author of the article.
- For articles where the authors are the editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, members of the editorial board of the journal, the review is carried out only by external reviewers; in this case, the selection of reviewers is carried out by one of the members of the editorial board of the journal, who is not part of the author's team.
- Each reviewer has the right to refuse a review in case of an obvious conflict of interest affecting the perception and interpretation of the manuscript materials. Based on the results of the review of the manuscript, the reviewer makes recommendations on the further fate of the article (each decision of the reviewer is justified):
- the article is recommended for publication in this form;
- the article is recommended for publication after correcting the shortcomings noted by the reviewer;
- the article needs additional review by another specialist;
- the article cannot be published in the journal.
- After receiving positive reviews, the article is queued for publication in accordance with the priority level determined individually for each article. A copy of the review is provided to the author upon his request (via e-mail: vestnikanestrean@gmail.com). The author has the opportunity to receive information about the approximate dates of publication also upon his request to the specified e-mail address. The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient reason for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made by the editorial board.
- If the review contains recommendations for correcting and finalizing the article, the editorial board of the journal sends the author the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account when preparing a new version of the article or to refute them (partially or completely). The revision of the article should not take more than 3 months from the date of sending an e-mail to the authors about the need to make changes. The article revised by the author is re-sent for review. In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to submit a reasoned response to the editorial board of the journal. The article can be sent for re-review, or for approval by the editorial board.If the authors refuse to finalize the materials, they must notify the editorial board in writing or orally of their refusal to publish the article. If the authors do not return the revised version after 3 months from the date of sending the review, even if there is no information from the authors refusing to finalize the article, the editorial board removes it from the register. In such situations, the authors are notified of the withdrawal of the manuscript from registration due to the expiration of the deadline for revision.
- If the author and the reviewers have unresolved contradictions regarding the manuscript, the editorial board has the right to send the manuscript for additional review. In conflict situations, the decision is made by the editor-in-chief at a meeting of the editorial board.
- The decision to refuse publication of the manuscript is made at a meeting of the editorial board in accordance with the recommendations of the reviewers. An article that is not recommended for publication by the decision of the editorial board is not accepted for reconsideration. A notification of refusal to publish is sent to the author by e-mail.
- The editorial board evaluates articles that are being prepared for publication in the next issue of the journal. The meetings of the editorial board are held 1 time in 2 months no later than 1 month before the issue of the edition. The Editorial Board approves the list of articles to be published in the current issue of the journal. She has the right to reject a peer-reviewed article if the editorial board has questions about certain aspects of the article and send it for additional external review. The selection of the reviewer's candidacy for additional external review of the article is carried out by the editorial board. A member of the editorial board of the journal may be appointed as an additional reviewer. The decision of the editorial board is recorded in the minutes of the meeting. The decision to publish a manuscript that has received a positive review is made at a meeting of the editorial board on the formation of the next issue of the journal. Approval of the content of the journal issue.
- After the decision of the editorial board of the journal to admit the article for publication, the editorial board informs the author about it and specifies the publication dates.
- In conflict situations, the decision is made by the editor-in-chief.
- The editorial board of the journal sends copies of the reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon receipt of a corresponding request.
Indexation
Articles in «Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION» are indexed by several systems:
- Russian Scientific Citation Index (RSCI) – a database, accumulating information on papers by Russian scientists, published in native and foreign titles. The RSCI project is under development since 2005 by “Electronic Scientific Library” foundation (elibrary.ru).
- Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. The Google Scholar index includes most peer-reviewed online journals of Europe and America's largest scholarly publishers, plus scholarly books and other non-peer reviewed journals.
- Base
- Dimensions
- EDS
- SOCIONET
- WorldCat
- DOAJ
Publishing Ethics
Update date: 04.10.2024
General provisions
The editorial staff and the editorial board of the scientific and practical journal "Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation" follow the ethical standards adopted by the international scientific community and do everything to prevent any violations of these standards. In their activities, the editorial staff, the editorial board and the publisher of the journal rely on the recommendations and standards of the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications – Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and also take into account the experience of reputable international journals and publishers. The principles of ethical behavior presented below are mandatory for all parties involved in the process of reviewing and publishing a scientific article: the author(s), reviewers, editorial staff, editorial board and publisher of the journal.
Compliance with the rules of ethics of scientific publications by all participants in this process helps to ensure the rights of authors to intellectual property, improve the quality of publications in the eyes of the world scientific community and exclude the possibility of misuse of copyrighted materials in the interests of individuals.
- Introduction
1.1. Publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only a simple way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Editors of the journal, Reviewers, Publishers and Scientific Society for the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation».
1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for compliance with all modern recommendations in the published work.
1.3. The Publisher undertakes obligations for the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our journal programs provide an unbiased "report" on the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility to properly present these "reports", especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.
- Duties of Editors
2.1. Decision on publication The editor of the scientific journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» is personally and independently responsible for making a decision on publication, often in collaboration with the relevant Scientific Society. The reliability of the work in question and its scientific significance should always be the basis of the decision to publish. The editor may be guided by the policy of the Editorial Board of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation», being limited by current legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, legality and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other Editors and Reviewers (or officials of the Scientific Society) during the decision on publication.
2.2. Decency The editor should evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.
2.3. Confidentiality The editor and the Editorial Board of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» are obliged not to disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, except for the Authors, Reviewers, possible Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher.
2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely, request a Co-editor, an Assistant Editor, or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board when reviewing the work instead of personally reviewing and making a decision) in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies and possibly other organizations related to the manuscript.
2.5. Supervision of publications. The editor, who has provided convincing evidence that the statements or conclusions presented in the publication are erroneous, should inform the Publisher (and/or the relevant Scientific Society) about this in order to promptly notify of changes, withdrawal of the publication, expression of concern and other relevant statements.
2.6. Engagement and collaboration in research The Editor, together with the Publisher (or the Scientific Society), take adequate response measures in case of ethical claims concerning the reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the authors of the manuscript and argumentation of the relevant complaint or claim, but may also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.
- Responsibilities of Reviewers
3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board Reviewing helps the Editor to make a decision about publication and, through appropriate interaction with the Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in scientific communications.
3.2. Performance Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review the manuscript or does not have enough time to complete the work quickly should notify the Editor of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» and ask to be excluded from the review process of the relevant manuscript.
3.3. Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. This work cannot be opened and discussed with any persons who do not have the authority to do so from the Editor.
3.4. Requirements for the manuscript and objectivity. The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their opinions clearly and reasonably.
3.5. Recognition of primary sources
Reviewers should identify significant published works that correspond to the topic and are not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. Any statement (observation, conclusion, or argument) published earlier should have a corresponding bibliographic reference in the manuscript. The Reviewer should also draw the Editor's attention to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.
3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.
3.6.3. When choosing a reviewer, the editorial board takes into account potential conflicts of interest: the reviewer cannot be a supervisor, subordinate or employer of the author, co-author of previous articles, relative of the author of the article.
3.6.4. For articles where the authors are the editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, members of the editorial board of the journal, the review is carried out only by external reviewers; in this case, the selection of reviewers is carried out by one of the members of the editorial board of the journal, who is not part of the author's team.
- Responsibilities of the Authors
4.1. Requirements for manuscripts
4.1.1 The authors of the original research report should provide reliable results of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the study. The data underlying the work must be presented accurately. The work should contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.
4.1.2. Reviews and scientific articles should also be accurate and objective, the Editorial Board's point of view should be clearly indicated.
4.2. Access to data and their storage
The authors may be asked for raw data related to the manuscript for review by the Editors. Authors should be ready to provide open access to this kind of information (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case be ready to save this data for an adequate period of time after publication.
4.3. Originality and plagiarism
4.3.1 Authors should make sure that a completely original work is presented and, in case of using the works or statements of other Authors, should provide appropriate bibliographic references or excerpts.
4.3.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as an author's work to copying or paraphrasing essential parts of someone else's work (without attribution) and to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and unacceptable.
4.4. Multiplicity, redundancy and simultaneity of publications
4.4.1 In general, an author should not publish a manuscript, mostly devoted to the same research, in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.
4.4.2. In general, the author should not submit a previously published article for consideration in another journal.
4.4.3. The publication of a certain type of articles (for example, clinical recommendations, translated articles) in more than one journal is in some cases ethical if certain conditions are met. Authors and Editors of interested journals must agree to a secondary publication that necessarily presents the same data and interpretations as in the first published work. The bibliography of the primary work should also be presented in the second publication. More detailed information about the acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found on the page www.icmje.org.
4.5. Recognition of primary sources It is always necessary to recognize the contribution of others. Authors should refer to publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, during a conversation, correspondence or in the process of discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the explicit written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as the evaluation of manuscripts or the provision of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the Authors of the work related to confidential sources.
4.6. Authorship of the publication
4.6.1 The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the idea of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Co-authors. In cases where research participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of the research project, they should be listed as persons who have made significant contributions to this study.
4.6.2. The author must make sure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study are represented as Co-authors and those who did not participate in the study are not listed as Co-authors, that all Co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.
4.7. Risks, as well as people and animals that are the objects of research 4.7.1 If the work involves the use of chemical products, procedures or equipment, the operation of which may involve any unusual risk, the Author must clearly indicate this in the manuscript. 4.7.2 If animals or humans are supposed to participate in the work as objects of research, the authors must make sure that the manuscript indicates that all stages of the study comply with the legislation and regulatory documents of research organizations, as well as approved by the relevant committees. The manuscript should clearly reflect that informed consent has been obtained from all people who have become objects of research. It is always necessary to ensure that the rights to privacy are respected.
4.8. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
4.8.1 All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as having influenced the results or conclusions presented in the work.
4.8.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, joint-stock ownership, receiving royalties, providing expert opinions, patent application or patent registration, grants and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.
4.9. Significant errors in published works
If the Author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» and interact with the Editor in order to withdraw the publication as soon as possible or correct errors. If the Editor or Publisher has received information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.
- Responsibilities of the Publishing House
5.1 The Publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the performance of ethical duties by Editors, Reviewers and Authors of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» in accordance with these requirements. The publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production has not influenced the Editors' decisions.
5.2. The publishing house should support the Editors of the journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» in reviewing claims to the ethical aspects of published materials and help to interact with other journals and/or Publishers, if this contributes to the fulfillment of the duties of the Editors.
5.3. The Publisher should promote good research practices and implement industry standards in order to improve ethical guidelines, procedures for the removal and correction of errors. 5.4 The Publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary.
- Information on informed consent and information on human and animal rights
In its work, the scientific and practical journal «Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation» relies on the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association (WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects) and strives to ensure compliance with ethical norms and rules for data collection for research that is conducted with human participation.
Medical research involving humans should comply with generally accepted scientific principles and be based on the maximum knowledge of scientific literature, other relevant sources of information, on the results of appropriately conducted laboratory studies, as well as, where applicable, animal studies. It is also necessary to show humanity towards the animals used in the study.Before starting the research, the scientist should familiarize himself with the provisions on informed consent of the Helsinki Declaration and conduct the research in strict accordance with the principles set out below (the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration 25-32 are given).
«25. Participation as research subjects of persons capable of giving informed consent should be voluntary. Although consultation with relatives or leaders of a social group may be appropriate in some cases, no person who is able to give informed consent can be included in the study unless they have given their own voluntary consent.
- In a medical study involving persons capable of giving informed consent as subjects of the study, each potential subject should receive sufficient information about the goals, methods, sources of funding, any possible conflicts of interest, affiliation to any organizations, expected benefits and potential risks, and inconveniences that may arise as a result of participation in the study, the conditions that apply after the end of the study, as well as any other significant aspects of the study. A potential research subject should be informed of their right to refuse to participate in the study or withdraw their consent to participate at any time without any adverse consequences for themselves. Special attention should be paid to the specific information needs of each potential entity, as well as the methods used to provide information.
After making sure that the potential subject understands the information provided to him, a doctor or other person with appropriate qualifications should obtain the subject's voluntary informed consent to participate in the study, preferably in writing. If the consent cannot be expressed in writing, the oral consent must be duly executed and attested.
All subjects of medical research should be given the opportunity to receive information about the general conclusions and results of the study.
- When obtaining informed consent to participate in a study, the doctor should exercise special caution in cases where the potential subject is in a position dependent on the doctor, or may give consent under pressure. In such cases, informed consent must be obtained by a person who has the appropriate qualifications and is completely independent of this kind of relationship.
- If the potential subject of the study is a person who is unable to give informed consent, the doctor must obtain the informed consent of his legal representative. Such persons should not be included in studies that do not have a likely benefit for them, except in cases where such research is conducted in order to improve the provision of medical care to a group of people represented by a potential subject, cannot be replaced by research on persons who are able to give informed consent, and is associated only with minimal risks and inconveniences.
- If a potential subject, recognized as unable to give informed consent, is nevertheless able to express his own attitude towards participating in the study, the doctor must request his opinion in addition to the consent of his legal representative. The disagreement of the potential subject must be taken into account.
- Studies involving subjects who are physically or mentally unable to give consent, such as patients who are unconscious, can only be conducted on the condition that a physical or mental condition that prevents informed consent is an integral characteristic of the study group.In such cases, the doctor must request informed consent from a legal representative. If such a representative is not available, and if the inclusion of the patient cannot be delayed, the study may be conducted without obtaining informed consent, provided that the special reasons for including subjects in the study in a condition that prevents the provision of informed consent are specified in the study protocol, and the conduct of the study is approved by the ethics committee. The consent of the subject or his legal representative to continue participating in the study should be obtained as soon as possible.
- The doctor must provide the patient with complete information about which aspects of treatment relate to the ongoing study. The patient's refusal to participate in the study or the decision to withdraw from the study should not affect his relationship with the doctor.
- In medical research using biological materials or data that allows the identification of the person from whom they were obtained, for example, when researching materials or data contained in biobanks or similar repositories, the doctor must obtain informed consent to receive, store and/or reuse such materials and data. There may be exceptions where obtaining consent for such a study is impossible or impractical. In such cases, the study can only be conducted after consideration and approval by the ethics committee." When presenting the results of experimental studies on humans, the authors should indicate whether the procedures performed corresponded to the ethical standards prescribed in the Helsinki Declaration. If the study was conducted without taking into account the principles of the Declaration, the authors must justify the chosen approach to conducting the study and ensure that the ethics committee of the organization in which the study was conducted approved the chosen approach».
Founder
- Pavlov University
- RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS AND REANIMATOLOGISTS
Author fees
Update date: 04.10.2024
Publication in «Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION» is free of charge for all the authors.
The journal doesn't have any Arcticle processing charges.
The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Update date: 04.10.2024
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Plagiarism detection
Update date: 04.10.2024
«Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION» use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
Preprint and postprint Policy
Update date: 04.10.2024
Prior to acceptance and publication in «Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION», authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.
As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in «Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION» we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.
Glossary (by SHERPA)
Advertising in the magazine
The editorial board is responsible for the placement of advertising materials within the limits established by the advertising policy of the journal " Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation", located at: 197022, St. Petersburg, Lva Tolstogo str., 6-8, Pavlov University. The editorial board takes all measures prescribed by law to publish legitimate and correct advertising.
The cost of advertising and color illustrations (from 1.01.2023):
Module: A4 format (210x297 mm) to cut, CMYK color, 300 dpi, any format without compression (tif, eps, ai, pdf) on the sticker – 38700 rubles.
Module: A4 format (210x297 mm) to cut, CMYK color, 300 dpi, any format without compression (tif, eps, ai, pdf) on the cover (2nd and 3rd pages) – 51700 rubles.
Placement of color illustrations for the article, one strip (tif, eps, ai, pdf) on the cover (2nd and 3rd pages) – 25,500 rubles.
