Evaluation of oxygen saturation as an indicator for tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study

   Background. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of clinical criteria for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients with respiratory failure became more noteworthy, especially in resource limitations. The objective was to evaluate the importance of hemoglobin oxygen saturation as a criterion for tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19.
   Materials and methods. This is a multi-center, prospective, observational cohort study. We included 117 patients with COVID-19 who needed respiratory support between March to June 2021. Patients were intubated by the protocol of each institution participating in the study and the anesthesiologist’s clinical judgement. Signs of respiratory failure, methods of respiratory support and patient outcome were recorded.
   Results. Among 117 studied cases, 100 patients had hemoglobin oxygen saturation of 60–90 % in whom 58 were intubated. During hospitalization, 56 intubated patients and 14 non-intubated patients died (96.6 % Vs. 33.3 %).
   Conclusion. Arterial blood hemoglobin oxygen saturation of 60–90 could not be the correct key to unlock the problem of intubation decision in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, hemoglobin oxygen saturation should not be solely regarded as an indication for intubation in COVID-19. 

1. Ahmad I., Jeyarajah J., Nair G. et al. A prospective, observational, cohort study of airway management of patients with COVID-19 by specialist tracheal intubation teams. Can J Anesth, 2021, vol. 68 , no. 2, pp. 196-203. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01804-3.

2. Scylla and Charybdis / Encyclopedia Britannica, 2020. (Epub.), Available: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Scylla-and-Charybdis (Accessed 15. 03. 2023).

3. Dondorp A. M., Hayat M., Aryal D. et al. Respiratory support in COVID-19 patients, with a focus on resource-limited settings. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020, vol. 102 , no. 6, pp.1191-1197. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283.

4. Hakim R., Watanabe Tejada L. C., Sukhal S. et al. A systematic review of the criteria for endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation in randomized trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, vol. 197, pp. A5134.

5. Hashemian S. M., Jamaati H., Malekmohammad M. et al. Efficacy of early prone positioning combined with noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19. Tanaffos, 2021, vol. 20, pp. 82-85. PMID: 34976078. PMCID: PMC8710224.

6. Lee Y. H., Choi K.-J., Choi S. H. et al. Clinical significance of timing of intubation in critically ill patients with covid-19: a multi-center retrospective study. J Clin Med, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2847. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092847.

7. Quintão V. C., Simões C. M., Lima L. H. N. E. et al. The anesthesiologist and COVID-19. Brazilian journal of anesthesiology, 2020, vol. 70 , no. 2, pp. 77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.002.

8. Sun Q., Qiu H., Huang M. et al. Lower mortality of COVID-19 by early recognition and intervention: experience from Jiangsu Province. Annals of Intensive Care, 2020, vol. 10 , no. 1, pp. 33. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00650-2.

9. Syal R., Kumari K., Kumar R. et al. The saga of an anesthesiologist: frontline COVID-19 warrior. Brazilian J Anesthesiol, 2020, vol. 70 , no. 5, pp. 566. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.08.008.

10. Tabashi S., Mirkheshti A., Dahi M. et al. Supplemental oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation in Corona Virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Cellular and Molecular Anesthesia, 2020, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27-31. doi: 10.22037/jcma.v5i1.29689.

11. Whittle J. S., Pavlov I., Sacchetti A. D. et al. Respiratory support for adult patients with COVID‐19. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2020, vol. 1 , no. 2, pp. 95-101. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12071.

12. WHO Coronavirus Dashboard. WHO Organization, 2021. (Epub.), Available: https://covid19.who.int (Accessed 15. 03. 2023).