EVALUATION TECHNIQUE FOR INFORMATIVE VALUE OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS IN ANESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE
https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-5-71-75
Abstract
The statistic rates describing the accuracy of diagnostic techniques and their combination have been analyzed including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative prognostic value, plausibility relation. The best evaluation technique for diagnostic test accuracy at present has been studied, i.e. building up ROC-curve and evaluation of the area under it (Area Under Curve). Advantages and deficiencies of each test have been presented, and their use in the clinical practice has been described.
About the Authors
A. V. Boyarkina
S. I. Georgievsky Medical Academy, Simferopol, V. I. Vernadsky Crimea Federal University, Simferopol
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. L. Potapov
S. I. Georgievsky Medical Academy, Simferopol, V. I. Vernadsky Crimea Federal University, Simferopol
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Boyarkina A.V. Vliyanie psikhologicheskikh i geneticheskikh faktorov na effektivnost’ posleoperatsionnoy analgezii opioidami. Diss. kand. med. nauk. [Effect of psychological and genetic factors on the efficiency of post-surgery analgesia with opioids. Cand. Diss.]. 14.01.20. St. Petersburg, 2015, 137 p. http://szgmu.ru/ds/upload/files/ Диссертация Бояркина.pdf
2. Paklin N. Logisticheskaya regressiya i ROC-analiz – matematicheskiy apparat. [Logic regression and ROC-analysis – mathematical tool]. (Epub.) 2015, Available at http://basegroup.ru/community/articles/logistic
3. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ, 1994, vol. 308 (6943), pp. 1552.
4. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ, 1994, vol. 309 (6947), pp. 102.
5. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 837-845.
6. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 1982, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 29-36.
7. Sommer M., de Rijke J.M., van Kleef M. et al. The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol., 2008, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 267-274.
8. Parikh R., Mathai A., Parikh S. et al. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian. J. Ophthalmol., 2008, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 45-50.
9. Weinstein S., Obuchowski N.A., Lieber M.L. Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests. Am. J. Roentgenol., 2005, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 14-19.
10. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., Mcclish D.K. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. Biometrics, 2003, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 203-204.
11. Zweig M.H., Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem., 1993, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 561-577.
Review
For citations:
Boyarkina A.V., Potapov A.L. EVALUATION TECHNIQUE FOR INFORMATIVE VALUE OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS IN ANESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2015;12(5):71-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2015-12-5-71-75
Email this article 