Modern pharmacological approaches to pain management in oncology patients. Part II (narrative review)
https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-3-121-133
Abstract
Introduction. The second part of this review focuses on clinical scenarios, in which standard analgesic regimens in cancer patients show limited efficacy or unacceptable tolerability, including mixed pain phenotypes, a pronounced neuropathic component, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We address pharmacological approaches that may be feasible for implementation with adequate clinical workflow organization, as well as experimental targets shaping the «next wave» of mechanism-based, targeted analgesia.
The objective was to critically synthesize the available evidence on implementable and theoretically promising pharmacological analgesic strategies in patients with malignant disease.
Materials and methods. In the second part, a narrative review was performed using the methodology for searching and critically evaluating sources described in detail in the first part of the series; the literature search was additionally updated as of 10.23.2025 with an emphasis on implemented and experimental pharmacological approaches.
Sections. The following approaches are presented as promising methods suitable for routine implementation: xenon–O₂ in subanesthetic regimens as an option for rapid reduction of pain/anxiety with opioid-sparing potential; intrathecal analgesia using ziconotide as an effective strategy for generalized refractory pain with a prominent neuropathic component; and the 8% capsaicin patch as a local treatment for selected subtypes of painful focal CIPN/peripheral neuropathy. Experimental approaches with theoretically justified potential include anti-NGF antibodies, TrkA antagonists, selective NaV1.7 blockers, P2X3 (and P2X2/3) antagonists, as well as σ1 antagonists, KCC2 modulators, CSF1R inhibitors, and tetrahydrobiopterin.
Conclusions. Xenon at subanesthetic concentrations appears to be the most promising approach. Intrathecal therapy remains a powerful option for the control of refractory pain but is associated with technical complexity and potential complications. The 8% capsaicin patch occupies a narrow yet clinically useful niche in focal painful neuropathy/CIPN. Experimental targets support the concept of phenotype-oriented analgesia; however, they are not yet ready for routine clinical use without further accumulation of robust clinical evidence.
About the Authors
M. L. PogosyanRussian Federation
Pogosyan Mesrop L., Senior Lecturer of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care with a Course of Medical Rehabilitation
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198
M. V. Petrova
Russian Federation
Petrova Marina V., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care with a Course of Medical Rehabilitation, Institute of Medicine; Deputy Director for Research and Clinical Activities
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198
25, Building 2, Petrovka str., Moscow, 107031
O. A. Grebenchikov
Russian Federation
Grebenchikov Oleg A., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Laboratory of Organoprotection in Critical Conditions
25, Building 2, Petrovka str., Moscow, 107031
V. V. Antonova
Russian Federation
Antonova Viktoria V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Research Fellow of the Laboratory of Organoprotection in Critical Conditions, V. A. Negovsky Research Institute
25, Building 2, Petrovka str., Moscow, 107031
R. A. Cherpakov
Russian Federation
Cherpakov Rostislav A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Fellow of the Laboratory of Organoprotection in Critical Conditions, V. A. Negovsky Research Institute
25, Building 2, Petrovka str., Moscow, 107031
References
1. Abuzarova G. R., Khoronenko V. E., Sarmanaeva R. R. et al. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of xenon inhalations in the treatment of chronic cancer pain. Annals of Critical Care, 2020, no. 4, pp. 48–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-48-57 .
2. Zinkovich M. S., Rozenko L. Ya., Shikhlyarova A. I. et al. Effect of xenon therapy on the tolerability of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with solitary brain metastasis. Medical Herald of the South of Russia, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 32–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2018-9-1-32-41.
3. Lisichenko I. A., Gusarov V. G., Teplykh B. A. et al. Quantitative assessment of amnestic effect and depth of consciousness depression during therapeutic inhalation of a xenon–oxygen mixture. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2022, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-5-19-27
4. Nikolaev K. S., Kantsurov S. S. Xenon–oxygen therapy in the comprehensive prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Effective Pharmacotherapy, 2014, no. 1, pp. 26–29. (In Russ.).
5. Popova N. N., Sekhin D. V., Dyakova S. V. et al. Clinical use of xenon–oxygen therapy to correct neuropsychological and adaptive status disturbances in young patients with hormone-dependent breast cancer after total oophorectomy. South Russian Journal of Cancer, 2025, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 16–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2025-6-3-2.
6. Shpichko A. I., Kuzovlev A. N., Cherpakov R. A. et al. A new strategy for the treatment of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness using xenon: a prospective pilot study. Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care, 2022, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 592–599. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2022-11-4-592-599.
7. Anand P., Elsafa E., Priestly R. et al. Rational treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with capsaicin 8% patch // Journal of Pain Research. – 2019. – Vol. 12. – P. 2039–2049. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S213912.8.
8. Baumert J. H., Hein M., Hecker K. E. et al. Xenon or propofol anaesthesia for patients at cardiovascular risk in non-cardiac surgery // British Journal of Anaesthesia. – 2008. – Vol. 100, № 5. – P. 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen050.9.
9. Bedi A., McCarroll C., Murray J. M. et al. The effects of subanaesthetic concentrations of xenon in volunteers // Anaesthesia. – 2002. – Vol. 57, №. 3. – P. 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02455.x.
10. Bedi A., Murray J. M., Dingley J. et al. Use of xenon as a sedative for patients receiving critical care // Crit Care Med. – 2003. – Vol. 31, № 10. – P. 2470–2477. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000089934.66049.76.
11. Bienfait F., Colin V., Parat A. et al. Evaluation of 8% capsaicin patches in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a real-world efficacy and tolerability study // Cancers (Basel). – 2023. – Vol. 15, № 2. – P. 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020349.
12. Bruel B. M., Burton A. W. Intrathecal Therapy for Cancer-Related Pain // Pain Medicine. – 2016. – Vol. 17, № 12. – P. 2404–2421. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw060.
13. Bruna J., Videla S., Argyriou A. A. et al. Efficacy of a novel sigma-1 receptor antagonist for oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa clinical trial // Neurotherapeutics. – 2018. – Vol. 15. – P. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0572-5.
14. Coburn M., Kunitz O., Baumert J. H. et al. Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofol anaesthesia // British Journal of Anaesthesia. – 2005. – Vol. 94, № 2. – P. 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei023.
15. Cronin S. J. F., Rao S., Tejada M. A. et al. Phenotypic drug screen uncovers the metabolic GCH1/BH4 pathway as key regulator of EGFR/KRAS-mediated neuropathic pain and lung cancer // Science Translational Medicine. – 2022. – Vol. 14, № 660. – eabj1531. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1531.
16. Cronin S. J. F., Andrews N. A., Latremoliere A. Peripheralized sepiapterin reductase inhibition as a safe analgesic therapy // Front Pharmacol. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – e1173599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1173599.
17. Dickinson R., Peterson B. K., Banks P. et al. Competitive inhibition at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor by the anesthetic xenon // Anesthesiology. – 2007. – Vol. 107, № 5. – P. 756–767 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000287061.77674.71.
18. Dobrovolsky A. V., Ichim T. E., Ma D. et al. Xenon in the treatment of panic disorder: an open label study // Journal of Translational Medicine. – 2017. – Vol. 15. – P. 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1237-1.
19. Dupoiron D., Bore F., Lefebvre-Kuntz D. et al. Ziconotide adverse events in patients with cancer pain: a multicenter observational study of a slow titration, multidrug protocol // Pain Physician. – 2012. – Vol. 15, № 5. – P. 395–403.
20. Eagles D. A., Chow C. Y., King G. F. Fifteen years of NaV1.7 channels as an analgesic target: Why has excellent in vitro pharmacology not translated into in vivo analgesic efficacy? // British Journal of Pharmacology. – 2022. – Vol. 179, № 14. – P. 3592–3611. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15327. PMID: 33206998.
21. Edwards R. R., Dworkin R. H., Turk D. C. et al. Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations // Pain Reports. – 2016. – Vol. 157, № 9. – P. 1851–1871. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602.
22. Fallon M., Sopata M., Dragon E. et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the anti-nerve growth factor antibody tanezumab in subjects with cancer pain due to bone metastasis // The Oncologist. – 2023. – Vol. 28, № 12. – P. e1268–e1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad188.
23. Gagnon M., Bergeron M. J., Lavertu G. et al. Chloride extrusion enhancers as novel therapeutics for neurological diseases // Nature Medicine. – 2013. – Vol. 19, № 11. – P. 1524 – 1528. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3356.
24. Gálvez R., Mayoral V., Cebrecos J. et al. E-52862-A selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist, in peripheral neuropathic pain: Two randomized, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with chronic postsurgical pain and painful diabetic neuropathy // Eur J Pain. – 2025. – Vol. 29, № 1. – e4755. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4755.
25. Godet G., Couaud A., Lucas A. et al. Cerebral oxygen saturation is improved by xenon anaesthesia during carotid clamping // HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. – 2013. – Vol. 5, № 2. – P. 110–118.
26. Gruss M., Bushell T. J., Bright D. P. et al. Two-pore-domain K+ channels are a novel target for the anesthetic gases xenon, nitrous oxide, and cyclopropane // Molecular Pharmacology. – 2004. – Vol. 65, № 2. – P. 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.65.2.443. PMID: 14742687.
27. Guan Z., Kuhn J. A., Wang X. et al. Injured sensory neuron-derived CSF1 induces microglial proliferation and DAP12-dependent pain // Nature Neuroscience. – 2016. – Vol. 19, № 1. – P. 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4189.
28. Hapfelmeier G., Haseneder R., Kochs E. et al. Nitrous oxide and xenon increase the efficacy of GABA at recombinant mammalian GABA(A) receptors // Anesth Analg. – 2000. – Vol. 91, № 6. – P. 1542–1549. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200012000-00045,
29. Haseneder R., Kratzer S., Kochs E. et al. Xenon reduces N-methyl-D-aspartate and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the amygdala // Anesthesiology. – 2008. – Vol. 109, № 6. – P. 998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818d6aee.
30. Holsträter T. F., Georgieff M., Föhr K. J. et al. Intranasal application of xenon reduces opioid requirement and postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial // Anesthesiology. – 2011. – Vol. 115, № 2. – P. 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225cee5.
31. Huerta M. Á., Marcos-Frutos D., Nava J. et al. P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors inhibition produces a consistent analgesic efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies // Eur J Pharmacol. – 2024. – № 984. – e177052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177052.
32. Jordan B., Margulies A., Cardoso F. et al. Systemic anticancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity: ESMO-EONS-EANO Clinical Practice Guidelines // Annals of Oncology. – 2020. – Vol. 31, № 10. – P. 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.003.
33. Kaan T. K. Y., Yip P. K., Grist J. et al. Systemic blockade of P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors attenuates bone cancer pain behaviour in rats // Brain. – 2010. – Vol. 133, № 9. – P. 2549–2564. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq194.
34. Latremoliere A., Latini A., Andrews N. et al. Reduction of neuropathic and inflammatory pain through inhibition of the tetrahydrobiopterin pathway // Neuron. – 2015. – Vol. 86, № 6. – P. 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.033.
35. Lee S., Shi X. Q., Fan A. et al. Targeting macrophage and microglia activation with colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor is an effective strategy to treat injury-triggered neuropathic pain // Molecular Pain. – 2018. – Vol. 14. – e1744806918764979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806918764979.
36. Loprinzi C. L., Lacchetti C., Bleeker J. et al. Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: ASCO Guideline Update // Journal of Clinical Oncology. – 2020. – Vol. 38, № 28. – P. 3325–3348. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01399.
37. Mantyh W. G., Jimenez-Andrade J. M., Stake J. I. et al. Blockade of nerve sprouting and neuroma formation markedly attenuates the development of late stage cancer pain // Neuroscience. – 2010. – Vol. 171, № 2. – P. 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.056.
38. Mapplebeck J. C. S., Lorenzo L.-E., Lee K. Y. et al. Chloride dysregulation through downregulation of KCC2 mediates neuropathic pain in both sexes // Cell Reports. – 2019. – Vol. 28, № 3. – P. 590–596.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.059.
39. McDonnell A., Collins S., Ali Z. et al. Efficacy of the Nav1.7 blocker PF-05089771 in a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study in subjects with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy // Pain. – 2018. – Vol. 159, № 8. – P. 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001227.
40. McGarvey L. P., Birring S. S., Morice A. H. et al. COUGH-1 and COUGH-2 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials // Lancet. – 2022. – Vol. 399, № 10328. – P. 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02348-5.
41. Nijs J., Lahousse A., Kapreli E. et al. Nociplastic pain criteria or recognition of central sensitization? Pain phenotyping in the past, present and future // Journal of Clinical Medicine. – 2021. – Vol. 10, № 15. – e3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153203.
42. Petersen-Felix S., Luginbühl M., Schnider T. W. et al. Comparison of the analgesic potency of xenon and nitrous oxide in humans evaluated by experimental pain // British Journal of Anaesthesia. – 1998. – Vol. 81, № 5. – P. 742–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/81.5.742.
43. Rauck R. L., Wallace M. S., Burton A. W. et al. Intrathecal ziconotide for neuropathic pain: a review // Pain Practice. – 2009. – Vol. 9, № 5. – P. 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00303.x.
44. Sanders R. D., Franks N. P., Maze M. Xenon: no stranger to anaesthesia // British Journal of Anaesthesia. – 2003. – Vol. 91, № 5. – P. 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg232.
45. Seretny M., Currie G. L., Sena E. S. et al. Incidence, prevalence, and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Pain. – 2014. – Vol. 155, № 12. – P. 2461–2470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.020.
46. Staats P. S., Yearwood T., Charapata S. G. et al. Intrathecal ziconotide in the treatment of refractory pain in patients with cancer or AIDS: a randomized controlled trial // JAMA. – 2004. – Vol. 291, № 1. – P. 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.1.63.
47. Stuttmann R., Paulsen R., Schnoor J. et al. Recovery index, attentiveness and state of memory after xenon or isoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial // BMC Anesthesiol. – 2010. – Vol. 10, № 5. – e5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-10-5.
48. Woolf C. J. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain // Pain. – 2011. – Vol. 152, Suppl 3. – P. S2–S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030.
49. Yang J., Xie Y. F., Smith R. et al. Discordance between preclinical and clinical testing of Na V 1.7-selective inhibitors for pain // Pain. – 2025. – Vol. 166, № 3. – P. 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003425.
50. Yuan Z. L., Liu X. D., Zhang Z. X. et al. Activation of GDNF-ERK-Runx1 signaling contributes to P2X3R gene transcription and bone cancer pain // iScience. – 2022. – Vol. 25, № 9. – e104936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104936.
Review
For citations:
Pogosyan M.L., Petrova M.V., Grebenchikov O.A., Antonova V.V., Cherpakov R.A. Modern pharmacological approaches to pain management in oncology patients. Part II (narrative review). Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2026;23(3):121-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-3-121-133




























