Mechanical power in lung-protective ventilation: biomechanical rationale, calculation methods, and conceptual limitations
https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-3-77-89
Abstract
Introduction. Mechanical power (MP) has been proposed as an integrative measure of ventilatory load, yet the variety of available calculation methods and their variable accuracy across ventilation modes limit its clinical adoption.
The objective was to review and comparatively analyze mathematical models for calculating mechanical power (MP) of mechanical ventilation, to examine their physical foundations, limitations, and clinical applicability.
Materials and methods. Narrative literature review. A search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, eLibrary databases covering the period 1990–2025. Publications addressing the geometric method of MP calculation, Gattinoni’s equation, surrogate formulas for volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), formula validation, and clinical MP thresholds were analyzed.
Results. Two approaches to MP calculation were identified: the geometric method (reference standard, based on integrating the area under the pressure-volume curve) and surrogate algebraic equations derived from ventilator-displayed parameters. Gattinoni’s equation (2016) is derived from the equation of motion and accounts for elastic and resistive components of respiratory work. Surrogate formulas for VCV and PCV show acceptable accuracy under standard ventilation conditions (bias ~ 1 J/min); however, accuracy decreases with extreme ventilation parameters. According to experimental data, MP values above 12 J/min are associated with ventilator induced lung injury (diffuse edema). In clinical studies, values above 17 J/min were independently associated with increased hospital mortality.
Conclusion. The MP concept may be considered as an integrated measure of the energy load on the respiratory system. Existing surrogate formulas may be used for clinical risk stratification, provided that the limitations of each model are recognized and the approach is individualized according to patient anthropometry and functional lung status.
About the Authors
D. S. KodatskiyRussian Federation
Kodatskiy Dmitriy s., Research Fellow, National Medical Research Center for Obstetric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care № 1
4, Academician Oparin str., Moscow, 117997
D. V. Marshalov
Russian Federation
Marshalov Dmitriy V., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow on Obstetric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
4, Academician Oparin str., Moscow, 117997
K. A. Sofronov
Russian Federation
Sofronov Kirill A., Research Fellow on Obstetric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care № 1
4, Academician Oparin str., Moscow, 117997
M. V. Ketskalo
Russian Federation
Ketskalo Mikhail V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Director on Obstetric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
4, Academician Oparin str., Moscow, 117997
B. V. Silaev
Russian Federation
Silaev Borislav V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care № 1
4, Academician Oparin str., Moscow, 117997
References
1. Kuz’kov V. V., Lapin K. S., Fot E. V., Kirov M. Yu. Ventilator-associated lung injury in the intensive care unit and operating room — what’s new? Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2020, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 47–61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-5-47-61.
2. Yaroshetskiy A. I., Gritsan A. I., Avdeev S. N. et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (in adult patients). Clinical guidelines (revision 2025). Vestnik intensivnoy terapii imeni A. I. Saltanova, 2025, no. 4, pp. 7–68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2025-4-7-68.
3. Amato M. B. P., Barbas C. S. V., Medeiros D. M. et al. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome // N Engl J Med. – 1998. – Vol. 338, № 6. – P. 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199802053380602.
4. Amato M. B. P., Meade M. O., Slutsky A. S. et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome // N Engl J Med. – 2015. – Vol. 372, № 8. – P. 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
5. Becher T., van der Staay M., Schädler D. et al. Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation // Intensive Care Med. – 2019. – Vol. 45, № 9. – P. 1321–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05636-8.
6. Brower R. G., Matthay M. A., Morris A. et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome // N Engl J Med. – 2000. – Vol. 342, № 18. – P. 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
7. Cressoni M., Gotti M., Chiurazzi C. et al. Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury // Anesthesiology. – 2016. – Vol. 124, № 5. – P. 1100–1108. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056.
8. Chiumello D., Gotti M., Guanziroli M. et al. Bedside calculation of mechanical power during volume- and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation // Crit Care. – 2020. – Vol. 24, № 1. – P. 417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03116-w.
9. Collino F., Gattinoni L., Camporota L. Ventilator-induced lung injury: a case for a larger umbrella? // Intensive Care Medicine. – 2024. – Vol. 50, № 2. – P. 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07296-1.
10. Damiani L. F., Basoalto R., Retamal J. et al. Mechanical power of ventilation: from computer to clinical implications // Respir Care. – 2023. – Vol. 68, № 12. – P. 1748–1763. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11462.
11. De Jong A., Wrigge H., Hedenstierna G. et al. How to ventilate obese patients in the ICU // Intensive Care Med. – 2020. – Vol. 46, № 12. – P. 2423–2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06286-x.
12. Dong Y., Li G., Fu J. et al. Association between time-weighted average mechanical power normalized to compliance and prognosis of critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database // Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). – 2025. – Vol. 50, № 2. – P. 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502258.
13. El-Khatib M., Zeeni C., Shebbo F. M. et al. Intraoperative mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications in low-risk surgical patients: a prospective observational cohort study // BMC Anesthesiol. – 2024. – Vol. 24. – P. 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02449-1.
14. Ferrando C., Soro M., Canet J. et al. Individualised perioperative open-lung approach versus standard protective ventilation in abdominal surgery (iPROVE): a randomised controlled trial // Lancet Respir Med. – 2018. – Vol. 6, № 3. – P. 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30024-9.
15. Gattinoni L., Collino F., Camporota L. Mechanical power: meaning, uses and limitations // Intensive Care Med. – 2023. – Vol. 49, № 4. – P. 465–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-06991-3.
16. Gattinoni L., Pesenti A. The concept of “baby lung” // Intensive Care Med. – 2005. – Vol. 31, № 6. – P. 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2627-z.
17. Gattinoni L., Tonetti T., Cressoni M. et al. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power // Intensive Care Med. – 2016. – Vol. 42, № 10. – P. 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2.
18. Ghiani A., Paderewska J., Sainis A. et al. Mechanical power normalized to lung-thorax compliance predicts prolonged ventilation and weaning failure: a prospective study // BMC Pulm Med. – 2021. – Vol. 21, № 1. – P. 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01566-8.
19. Giosa L., Busana M., Pasticci I. et al. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation // Intensive Care Med Exp. – 2019. – Vol. 7, № 1. – P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8.
20. Lusquinhos J., Tavares M., Abelha F. Postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative strategies: a systematic review // Cureus. – 2023. – Vol. 15, № 5. – e38786. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38786.
21. Henderson W. R., Chen L., Amato M. B. P. et al. Respiratory mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome // Am J Respir Crit Care Med. – 2017. – Vol. 196, № 7. – P. 822–833. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.201612-2495CI.
22. Huerta Arellano G., Zamorano León C. A., Castañeda Ordóñez E. et al. Poder mecánico y supervivencia en pacientes con ventilación mecánica: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis // Med Crítica. – 2023. – Vol. 37, № 8. – P. 707–712. https://doi.org/10.35366/115229.
23. Kallet R. H. Pressure control surrogate formula for estimating mechanical power is sufficiently accurate to assess mortality in ARDS, even when using VC ventilation // Respir Care. – 2025. – Vol. 70, № 4. – P. 427–433. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12269.
24. Kim W. Y., Chung C. R., Nam M. et al. Associations of mechanical power, ventilatory ratio, and other respiratory variables with ICU mortality in ARDS patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation // Front Med (Lausanne). – 2025. – Vol. 12. – 1553672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1553672.
25. Lagier D., Vidal Melo M. F. Protective ventilation during surgery: do lower tidal volumes really matter? // Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. – 2021. – Vol. 40, № 1. – P. 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100807.
26. Maia L. de A., Fernandes M. V. S., Santos R. S. et al. Effects of protective mechanical ventilation with different PEEP levels on alveolar damage and inflammation in a model of open abdominal surgery: a randomized study in obese versus non-obese rats // Front Physiol. – 2019. – Vol. 10. – P. 1513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513
27. Marini J. J., Rocco P. R. M., Gattinoni L. Static and dynamic contributors to ventilator-induced lung injury in clinical practice: pressure, energy, and power // Am J Respir Crit Care Med. – 2020. – Vol. 201, № 7. – P. 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.201908-1545CI.
28. Marini J. J., Crooke P. S., Rocco P. R. M. Mechanical power of ventilation: tracking the damaging component // Crit Care. – 2026. – Vol. 30. – P. 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05679-y.
29. Massari D., Montaruli C., Gotti M. et al. Determinants of energy dissipation in the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation // Crit Care. – 2015. – Vol. 19. – P. 247. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14327.
30. Nieman G. F., Satalin J., Andrews P. et al. Lung stress, strain, and energy load: engineering concepts to understand the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) // Intensive Care Med Exp. – 2016. – Vol. 4, № 1. – P. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-016-0090-5.
31. Nieman G. F., Kollisch-Singule M., Ramcharran H. et al. Unshrinking the baby lung to calm the VILI vortex // Crit Care. – 2022. – Vol. 26, № 1. – P. 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04105-x.
32. Paudel R., Trinkle C. A., Waters C. M. et al. Mechanical power: a new concept in mechanical ventilation // Am J Med Sci. – 2021. – Vol. 361, № 5. – P. 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2021.09.004.
33. Pelosi P., van der Poll T., Schultz M. J. et al. Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome // Crit Care. – 2021. – Vol. 25, № 1. – P. 250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03686-3.
34. Protti A., Andreis D. T., Monti M. et al. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: any difference between statics and dynamics? // Crit Care Med. – 2013. – Vol. 41, № 4. – P. 1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827417a6.
35. Rallabhandi U., Walker C., Ann Davis F. et al. Mechanical power is an early predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 // BMJ Open Respir Res. – 2025. – Vol. 12, № 1. – e003131. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003131.
36. Rezoagli E., Laffey J. G., Bellani G. Monitoring lung injury severity and ventilation intensity during mechanical ventilation // Semin Respir Crit Care Med. – 2022. – Vol. 43, № 3. – P. 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748917.
37. Santer P., Wachtendorf L. J., Suleiman A. et al. Mechanical power during general anesthesia and postoperative respiratory failure: a multicenter retrospective cohort study // Anesthesiology. – 2022. – Vol. 137, № 1. – P. 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004256.
38. Santos R. S., Maia L. de A., Oliveira M. V. et al. Biologic impact of mechanical power at high and low tidal volumes in experimental mild acute respiratory distress syndrome // Anesthesiology. – 2018. – Vol. 128, № 6. – P. 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002143.
39. Scharffenberg M., Rocco P. R. M., Pelosi P. et al. Respiratory mechanics and mechanical power during low vs high positive end-expiratory pressure in obese surgical patients – a sub-study of the PROBESE randomized controlled trial // J Clin Anesth. – 2024. – Vol. 92. – 111242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111242.
40. Serpa Neto A., Deliberato R.O., Johnson A. E. W. et al. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med. – 2018. – Vol. 44, № 11. – P. 1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5375-6.
41. Snoep J. W. M., Rietveld P. J., Riemsma R. et al. Mechanical power in pressure-controlled ventilation: a simple and reliable bedside method // Crit Care Explor. – 2025. – Vol. 7, № 3. – e1224. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224.
42. Tontu F., Birtane D. Dynamic mechanical power at the bedside: a validation study in volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes // J Crit Care. – 2026. – Vol. 91. – 155314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155314.
43. Tonetti T., Marini J. J. Mechanical power and VILI modelling: limits and unknowns // Intensive Care Med Exp. – 2025. – Vol. 13, № 1. – P. 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00712-w.
44. von Düring S., Liu K., Munshi L. et al. Mechanical power and development of lung injury: understanding ventilator-induced lung injury // J Crit Care. – 2025. – Vol. 85. – P. 154902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154902.
45. Walkey A. J., Goligher E. C., van der Meijden S. et al. Higher PEEP versus lower PEEP strategies for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Ann Am Thorac Soc. – 2017. – Vol. 14, Suppl 4. – S297–S303. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-338OT.
46. Yan Y., Luo G., Chai X. et al. Mechanical power is associated with weaning outcome in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients // Sci Rep. – 2022. – Vol. 12, № 1. – 19634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21609-2.
47. Yan Y., Luo G., Chai X. et al. Mechanical power of ventilation and survival in critically ill obese patients // Am J Emerg Med. – 2025. – Vol. 93. – P. 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.066.
48. Zhang C., Li J., Wei H. et al. Driving pressure-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial // Anesth Analg. – 2021. – Vol. 133, № 5. – P. 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005575.
49. Zheng H., Zhou C., Li X. et al. The accuracy of simplified calculation of mechanical power: a simulation study // J Thorac Dis. – 2023. – Vol. 15, № 6. – P. 3237–3244. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1409.
50. Zhu Y., Peng W., Zhen S., Jiang X. Mechanical power normalized to predicted body weight is associated with mortality in critically ill patients // BMC Anesthesiol. – 2021. – Vol. 21, № 1. – P. 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01497-1.
Review
For citations:
Kodatskiy D.S., Marshalov D.V., Sofronov K.A., Ketskalo M.V., Silaev B.V. Mechanical power in lung-protective ventilation: biomechanical rationale, calculation methods, and conceptual limitations. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2026;23(3):77-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-3-77-89




























