Strategies for infusion therapy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-2-71-81
Abstract
Introduction. Fluid therapy is an integral component of anesthetic and resuscitation management in the early perioperative period following abdominal oncological surgery. Optimizing fluid therapy remains particularly challenging in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, particularly during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Currently, there is no consensus in the scientific community regarding the optimal regimen and strategy for fluid therapy during PD.
The objective was to analyze the clinical efficacy of different infusion therapy strategies in PD.
Materials and methods. A review of studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines on fluid therapy during pancreaticoduodenectomy was conducted. The search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register, Google Scholar, and e-Library (for Russian authors). Studies from the past ten years were primarily reviewed. Inclusion criteria for the review were text publications comparing restrictive, targeted, and liberal perioperative fluid therapy in patients undergoing PD. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, abstracts, abstracts without a full-text version, and publications not related to the study objective.
Results. Perioperative fluid therapy is a critical factor significantly affecting PD outcomes. Both excessive (liberal) and overly restrictive fluid regimens are associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including those specific to PD. An optimal fluid therapy strategy for PD should be balanced, avoiding both hyperand hypovolemia, and take into account individual patient risk factors (pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic consistency, albumin level).
Conclusion. A modern approach to the strategy of infusion therapy in PD should be personalized, physiologically justified and dynamically controlled and based on a constant assessment of the balance between ensuring adequate organ perfusion and preventing iatrogenic hyperhydration.
About the Authors
B. F. RakhmatullinRussian Federation
Rakhmatullin Bulat F., Anesthesiologist and Intensivist
Kazan
V. I. Egorov
Russian Federation
Egorov Vasiliy I., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Kazan State Medical University; Oncologist, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary named after Professor M. Z. Sigal
Kazan
F. Sh. Akhmetzyanov
Russian Federation
Akhmetzyanov Foat Sh., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Kazan State Medical University; Head of the Surgical Clinic, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary named after Professor M. Z. Sigal
Kazan
A. V. Pasheev
Russian Federation
Pasheev Artur V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Anesthesiologist and Intensivist
Kazan
References
1. Bobovnik S. V., Gorobets E. S., Zabolotskikh I. B. et al. Perioperative fluid therapy in adults. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology, 2021, vol. 4, pp. 17–33. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology20210417.
2. Vlasenko O. S., Polyakov A. N., Matveeva S. O. et al. Infusion therapy and acinar component of the pancreas as predictors of pancreatic fistula in pancreatoduodenectomy. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, 2025, vol. 5, pp. 58–65. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202505158.
3. Intensivnaya terapiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. V 2-kh tomakh. Zabolotskikh I. B., Protsenko D. N., eds. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media; 2020. (In Russ.).
4. Kharlamov K. Е., Yadgarov M. Ya., Likhvantsev V. V. The Protocol-Personalized Perioperative Hemodynamic Management as Part of the ERAS Protocol in Abdominal Surgeries. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation, 2021, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 55–61. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2021-18-4-55-613.
5. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care, 2025, vol. 48, no. Suppl 1, pp. S321–S334. http://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S016.
6. Bannone E., Andrianello S., Marchegiani G. et al. Postoperative acute pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a determinant of fistula potentially driven by the intraoperative fluid management. Ann Surg, 2018, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. 815–822. http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002900.
7. Bruns H., Kortendieck V., Raab H. R. et al. Intraoperative fluid excess is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB Surg, 2016, vol. 2016, Art. ID 1601340. http://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1601340.
8. De Backer D., Aissaoui N., Cecconi M. et al. How can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status? Intensive Care Med, 2022, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1482–1494. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06808-9.
9. Del Buono M. G., Montone R. A., Camilli M. et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, vol. 78, no. 13, pp. 1352–1371. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.042.
10. Edwards M. R., Forbes G., MacDonald N. et al. Optimisation of Perioperative Cardiovascular Management to Improve Surgical Outcome II (OPTIMISE II) trial: study protocol for a multicentre international trial of cardiac output-guided fluid therapy with low-dose inotrope infusion compared with usual care in patients undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery. BMJ Open, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. ID e023455. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023455.
11. Elmunzer B. J., Maranki J. L., Gómez V. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures. Am J Gastroenterol, 2023, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 405–426. http://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002190.
12. Eng O. S., Goswami J., Moore D. et al. Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol, 2013, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 242–247. http://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23393.
13. Evans L., Rhodes A., Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med, 2021, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1181–1247. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
14. Gallardo J.M., Padillo J., Martín-Malo A. et al. Increased plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide and endocrine markers of volume depletion in patients with obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg, 1998, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 28–31. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00572.x
15. Garland M. L., Mace H. S., MacCormick A.D. et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid regimens in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1250–1265. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04089-6.
16. Gianotti L., Besselink M. G., Sandini M. et al. Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery, 2018, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 1035–1048. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.040.
17. Gilgien J., Hübner M., Halkic N. et al. Perioperative fluids and complications after pancreatoduodenectomy within an enhanced recovery pathway. Sci Rep, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. ID 17898. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74907-y.
18. Gottin L., Martini A., Menestrina N. et al. Perioperative fluid administration in pancreatic surgery: a comparison of three regimens. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 569–577. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04166-4.
19. Hamidi M., Dauch J., Watson R. et al. Outcomes with preoperative biliary stenting after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the modern era. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 162-168. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04874-2.
20. Han I.W., Kim H., Heo J. et al. Excess intraoperative fluid volume administration is associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, vol. 96, no. 22, Art. ID e6893. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006893.
21. Heegaard B., Deis T., Rossing K. et al. Diabetes mellitus and hemodynamics in advanced heart failure. Int J Cardiol, 2023, vol. 379, pp. 60–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.03.015.
22. Holte K., Sharrock N. E., Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth, 2002, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 622–632. http://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aef220.
23. Ikuta S., Nakajima T., Kasai M., et al. Perioperative fluid balance and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score-adjusted analysis. Anticancer Res, 2023, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 4179-4187. http://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16609
24. Ji Y., Zhou Y., Shen Z. et al. Risk factors for and prognostic values of postoperative acute kidney injury after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study of 1312 patients. Cancer Med, 2023, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 7823–7834. http://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5543.
25. Kan C. F. K., Skaggs J. D. Current commonly used dynamic parameters and monitoring systems for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy: a review. Yale J Biol Med, 2023, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 107–123. http://doi.org/10.59249/JOAP6662.
26. Kendrick J. B., Kaye A. D., Tong Y. et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy in the perioperative setting. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2019, vol. 35, Suppl. 1, pp. S29–S34. http://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_26_18.
27. Kulemann B., Fritz M., Glatz T. et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with higher amounts of intra- and postoperative fluid therapy: A single center retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2017, vol. 16, pp. 23–29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.042.
28. Li S., Yin Y., Wang P. et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy during post-resection phase in low central venous pressure assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled superiority trial. J Anesth, 2024, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 77–85. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03282-5.
29. Maeda H., Okabayashi T., Yatabe T. et al. Perioperative intensive insulin therapy using artificial endocrine pancreas in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, vol. 15, no. 33, pp. 4111–4115. http://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4111.
30. Melloul E., Lassen K., Roulin D. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreatoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations 2019. World J Surg, 2020, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2056–2084. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.
31. Mladinov D., Isaza E., Gosling A. F. et al. Perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiol Clin, 2023, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 613–629. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2023.03.001.
32. Montero D., Diaz-Canestro C., Oberholzer L. et al. The role of blood volume in cardiac dysfunction and reduced exercise tolerance in patients with diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 807–816. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30119-6.
33. Myles P. S., Bellomo R., Corcoran T. et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med, 2018, vol. 378, no. 24, pp. 2263–2274. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801601.
34. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network; Shapiro N. I., Douglas I. S., Brower R. G. et al. Early restrictive or liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension. N Engl J Med, 2023, vol. 388, no. 6, pp. 499–510. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2212663.
35. Ostermann M., Auzinger G., Grocott M. et al. Perioperative fluid management: evidence-based consensus recommendations from the international multidisciplinary PeriOperative Quality Initiative. Br J Anaesth, 2024, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1263–1275. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.038.
36. Pantet O., Ageron F. X., Zingg T. Advances in resuscitation and deresuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2025, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 277–284. http://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001267.
37. Peden C. J., Aggarwal G., Aitken R. J. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: part 1-preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg, 2021, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1272–1290. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9.
38. Perel A., Habicher M., Sander M. Bench-to-bedside review: functional hemodynamics during surgery - should it be used for all high-risk cases? Crit Care, 2013, vol. 17, no. 1, Art. ID 203. http://doi.org/10.1186/cc11448.
39. Plurad D. S., Chiu W., Raja A. S. et al. Monitoring modalities and assessment of fluid status: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 37–49. http://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001719.
40. Roberto S., Milia R., Doneddu A. et al. Hemodynamic abnormalities during muscle metaboreflex activation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2019, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 444–453. http://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00794.2018.
41. Sandini M., Fernández-Del Castillo C. et al. Intraoperative fluid administration and surgical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: external validation at a tertiary referral center. World J Surg, 2019, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 929–936. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4842-0.
42. Scheeren T. W. L., Ramsay M. A. E. New Developments in hemodynamic monitoring. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2019, vol. 33, Suppl. 1, pp. S67–S72. http://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043.
43. Sitges-Serra A., Carulla X., Piera C. et al. Body water compartments in patients with obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg, 1992, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 553–556. http://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800790626.
44. Wang X., Wang N., Wang X. et al. Application value of goal-directed fluid therapy with ERAS in patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery. Am J Transl Res, 2021, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 8186–8192.
45. Weinberg L., Ianno D., Churilov L. et al. Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, no. 9, Art. ID e0183313. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183313.
46. Winer L. K., Dhar V. K., Wima K. et al. Perioperative net fluid balance predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1743–1751. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3813-y.
47. Yamane T., Izumi D., Kinoshita S. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy at a Non-high-volume Center and Efforts to Perform Safe Surgery. Anticancer Res, 2021, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 5223–5229. http://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15329.
48. Zampieri F. G., Bagshaw S. M., Semler M. W. Fluid therapy for critically ill adults with sepsis: a review. JAMA, 2023, vol. 329, no. 22, pp. 1967–1980. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.7560.
49. Zemła P., Bajak J., Molasy B. et al. A single-center retrospective study of selected clinical parameters and intraoperative fluid management of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit, 2022, vol. 28, Art. ID e936114. http://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.936114.
50. Zhang H., Feng Y., Suolang D. et al. Postoperative fluid balance and outcomes after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in 301 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, vol. 407, no. 4, pp. 1537–1544 http://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02443-6.
Review
For citations:
Rakhmatullin B.F., Egorov V.I., Akhmetzyanov F.Sh., Pasheev A.V. Strategies for infusion therapy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (literature review). Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2026;23(2):71-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-2-71-81




























