The use of fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group block in the framework of multimodal analgesia after primary hip replacement (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-6-117-127
Abstract
Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty is currently the standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis. However, this type of surgery is associated with the development of intense postoperative pain. Modern approaches to pain management are based on the principle of multimodal analgesia, which widely utilizes various methods of local anesthesia. The recent development of ultrasound technology and its integration into anesthesiology has significantly improved the safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks. This review discusses the clinical efficacy of two popular peripheral nerve blocks used in multimodal analgesia regimens: the Fascia Iliaca Block and the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block.
Materials and methods. The search for publications (1973–2024) was carried out in databases eLibrary.ru, PubMed, Google Scholar. A total of 50 publications were included, of which 45 were clinical studies.
Conclusion. Current evidence generally confirms the effectiveness of using regional anesthesia techniques such as FIB and PENG block as a part of multimodal analgesia in patients after primary THA. This approach provides an opioid-sparing effect, reduces the risk of various complications, and promotes early mobilization. However, there are currently insufficient data to provide clear recommendations for most aspects of the application of these blocks.
About the Authors
M. V. KuzminaRussian Federation
Kuzmina Maria V., Anesthesiologist-Intensivist of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care № 2 of the Scientific and Clinical Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
K. N. Khrapov
Russian Federation
Khrapov Kirill N., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Chief Research Fellow of the Scientific and Clinical Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
References
1. Albrecht E., Chin K. J. Advances in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management: a nar-rative review. Anaesthesia, 2020, vol. 75, Suppl 1, e101–e110. http://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14868.
2. Aliste J., Layera S., Bravo D. et al. Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 874–878. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-102997.
3. Anger M., Valovska T., Beloeil H. et al. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia, 2021, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1082–1097. http://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15498.
4. Azizoglu M., Rumeli S. Comparison of the suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hip surgeries: a retrospective study. Braz J Anesthesiol Elsevier, 2022, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 342–349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.006.
5. Bendtsen T. F., Pedersen E. M., Moriggl B. et al. Anatomical considerations for obturator nerve block with fascia iliaca compartment block. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 806–812. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-102553.
6. Bravo D., Aliste J., Layera S. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2023, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 489–494. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104332.
7. Bravo D., Layera S., Aliste J. et al. Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia ilia-ca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial. J Clin Anesth, 2020, vol. 66, 109907. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109907.
8. Capdevila X., Biboulet P., Bouregba M. et al. Comparison of the three-in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in adults: clinical and radiographic analysis. Anesth Analg, 1998, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1039–1044. http://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199805000-00025.
9. Dalens B., Vanneuville G., Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg, 1989, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 705–713.
10. Del Buono R., Padua E., Pascarella G. et al. Pericapsular nerve group block: an overview. Minerva Anestesiol, 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 458–466. http://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9.
11. Desmet M., Vermeylen K., Van Herreweghe I. et al. Longitudinal supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block reduces morphine consumption after total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2017, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 327–333. http://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000543.
12. Dobie I., Bennett D., Spence D. J. et al. Periarticular local anesthesia does not improve pain or mobility after THA. Clin Orthop, 2012, vol. 470, no. 7, pp. 1958–1965. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2241-7.
13. Dolan J., Williams A., Murney E. et al. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block: a comparison with the loss of resistance technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2008, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 526–531. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2008.03.008.
14. Et T., Korkusuz M. Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled tri-al. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2023, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 575–585. http://doi.org/10.4097/kja.23064.
15. Flaviano E., Bettinelli S., Assandri M. et al. Erector spinae plane versus fascia iliaca block after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial comparing analgesic effectiveness and motor block. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2023, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 326–335. http://doi.org/10.4097/kja.22669.
16. Gasanova I., Alexander J. C., Estrera K. et al. Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block versus periarticular infiltration for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2019, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 206–211. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-000016.
17. Girón-Arango L., Peng P. W. H., Chin K. J. et al. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block for hip fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2018, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 859–863. http://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
18. Hebbard P., Ivanusic J., Sha S. Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block: a ca-daveric evaluation of a novel approach. Anaesthesia, 2011, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 300–305. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06628.x.
19. Hu X., Chenyang D., Xu B. et al. Pericapsular nerve group block reduces opioid use and pain after hip surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 2024, vol. 19, no. 1, e0310008. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310008.
20. Jain N., Kotulski C., Al-Hilli A. et al. Fascia iliaca block in hip and femur fractures to reduce opioid use. J Emerg Med, 2022, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.04.018.
21. Joshi G. P., Kehlet H. Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2019, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 259–267. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.016.
22. Kaciroglu A., Ekinci M., Dikici M. et al. Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Med, 2024, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 257–262. http://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad166.
23. Kamel I., Ahmed M. F., Sethi A. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What ortho-pedic surgeons need to know. World J Orthop, 2022, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11–35. http://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.11.
24. Kopp S. L., Vandermeulen E., McBane R. D. et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiv-ing antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (fifth edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published online January 21, 2025. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105766.
25. Kumar K., Pandey R. K., Bhalla A. P. et al. Comparison of conventional infrainguinal versus modified proximal suprainguinal approach of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for postoperative analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 2015, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 95–100. PMID: 26767235.
26. Laumonerie P., Dalmas Y., Tibbo M. E. et al. Sensory innervation of the hip joint and referred pain: a systematic review of the literature. Pain Med Malden Mass, 2021, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1149–1157. http://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab061.
27. Lin D. Y., Brown B., Morrison C. et al. Pericapsular nerve group block results in a longer an-algesic effect and shorter time to discharge than femoral nerve block in patients after hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized trial. J Int Med Res, 2022, vol. 50, no. 3, 3000605221085073. http://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221085073.
28. Lin D. Y., Morrison C., Brown B. et al. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides im-proved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 398–403. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-102315.
29. Marino J., Russo J., Kenny M. et al. Continuous lumbar plexus block for postoperative pain control after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized con-trolled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 29–37. http://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00079.
30. Mosaffa F., Taheri M., Manafi Rasi A. et al. Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR, 2022, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 103135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103135.
31. Murphy T. P., Byrne D. P., Curtin P. et al. Can a periarticular levobupivacaine injection reduce postoperative opiate consumption during primary hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop, 2012, vol. 470, no. 4, pp. 1151–1157. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2108-3.
32. Natrajan P., Bhat R. R., Remadevi R. et al. Comparative study to evaluate the effect of ultra-sound-guided pericapsular nerve group block versus fascia iliaca compartment block on the postop-erative analgesic effect in patients un-dergoing surgeries for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res, 2021, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 285–289. http://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_122_21.
33. Nooh N. G. E., Hamed A. M. S., Moharam A. A. et al. A comparative study on combined gen-eral anesthesia with either continuous fascia iliaca block or epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol, 2016, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76. http://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.178884.
34. Pascarella G., Costa F., Del Buono R. et al. Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a random-ised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia, 2021, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1492–1498. http://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15536.
35. Pires Sousa I., Leite da Silva Peixoto C. I., Fernandes Coimbra L. A. et al. Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and epidural analgesia following total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed), 2022, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 632–639. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2022.10.002.
36. Rashwan D. Levobupivacaine patient controlled analgesia: Epidural versus blind fascia iliaca compartment analgesia – A comparative study. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2013, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2012.10.002.
37. Ridderikhof M. L., De Kruif E., Stevens M. F. et al. Ultrasound guided supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks in hip fracture patients: An alternative technique. Am J Emerg Med, 2020, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 231–236. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.011.
38. Short A. J., Barnett J. J. G., Gofeld M. et al. Anatomic study of innervation of the anterior hip capsule: implication for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2018, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 186–192. http://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000701.
39. Siddiqui Z. I., Cepeda M. S, Denman W. et al. Continuous lumbar plexus block provides im-proved analgesia with fewer side effects compared with systemic opioids after hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 393–398. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.008.
40. Slover J., Riesgo A., Payne A. et al. Modern anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty. Ann. Orthop. Rheumatol, 2014, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1026.
41. Specht K., Leonhardt J. S., Revald P. et al. No evidence of a clinically important effect of adding local infusion analgesia administrated through a catheter in pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 2011, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 315–320. http://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.570671.
42. Tomlinson J., Zwirner J., Ondruschka B. et al. Innervation of the hip joint capsular complex: A systematic review of histological and immunohistochemical studies and their clinical implications for contemporary treatment strategies in total hip arthroplasty. PLoS One, 2020, vol. 26, e0229128. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229128.
43. Vermeylen K., Desmet M., Leunen I. et al. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca com-partment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published online February 22, 2019:rapm-2018-100092. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-100092.
44. Vermeylen K., Soetens F., Leunen I. et al. The effect of the volume of supra-inguinal inject-ed solution on the spread of the injectate under the fascia iliaca: a preliminary study. J Anesth, 2018, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 908–913. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2558-9.
45. Wan L., Huang H., Zhang F. et al. Is pericapsular nerve group block superior to other re-gional analgesia techniques following total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and net-work meta-analysis. Perioper Med (Lond), 2024, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 96. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00455-y.
46. Wang X., Sun Y., Wang L. et al. Femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for pain con-trol in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, vol. 96, no. 27, e7382. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007382.
47. Winnie A. P., Ramamurthy S., Durrani Z. The inguinal paravascular technic of lumbar plexus anesthesia: the “3-in-1 block”. Anesth Analg, 1973, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 989–996.
48. Wu C. L., Cohen S. R., Richman J. M. et al. Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 2005, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1079–1088. http://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200511000-00023.
49. Zhang X. Y., Ma J. B. The efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for pain control after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg, 2019, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1053-1.
50. Zheng J., Pan D., Zheng B., Ruan X. Preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2022, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 155–160. http://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-103228.
Review
For citations:
Kuzmina M.V., Khrapov K.N. The use of fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group block in the framework of multimodal analgesia after primary hip replacement (literature review). Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2025;22(6):117-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-6-117-127




























