Preview

Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION

Advanced search

The effectiveness of perioperative anesthesia during uterine surgery, taking into account the psychoemotional status of patients

https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-4-65-75

Abstract

Introduction. The leading positions in terms of pain intensity in the postoperative period are occupied by operations in the scope of hysterectomy and myomectomy. The psychological component plays an important role in the formation of postoperative pain.

The objective was to conduct a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of methods of perioperative anesthesia during operations on the uterus with laparotomy access, taking into account the psychoemotional status of patients.

Materials and methods. The study included 50 patients who underwent scheduled hysterectomy from laparotomy access. Depending on the method of perioperative anesthesia, the patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 25) – combined spinal–epidural anesthesia; group 2 (n = 25) – spinal anesthesia with prolonged local anesthesia of the postoperative wound. On the eve of the operation, the level of anxiety and depression, pain catastrophization, and the level of alexithymia were assessed. In the postoperative period, the pain level was assessed according to a digital rating scale: at the time of the first activation, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, and at discharge. The activation time, the need for additional anesthesia, and satisfaction with the received anesthesia were analyzed.

Results. Pain syndrome was significantly higher in the 2nd group – 3 [2; 4] points at rest (p = 0.019) and 4 [3; 5] points during movement (p = 0.04), on the 1st day after surgery. In the 2nd group, more intense pain at the time of the first activation was 5 [3; 5] points (p = 0.001). Patients with identified anxiety/ depression have an increased need for local anesthetics. The preoperative pain catastrophization level of more than 19 points was accompanied by a more pronounced pain syndrome, regardless of the method of anesthesia. Patients who scored ≥ 55 points on the oronto Alexithymia Scale had a higher need for narcotic analgesics.

Conclusion. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is more effective in patients with signs of anxiety/depression and alexithymia. Clinically pronounced anxiety and depression according to HADS ≥ 8 points, a score according to PCS ≥ 19 points, as well as a score according to TAS-26 ≥ 55 points make it possible to identify a group at increased risk for the development of uncontrolled pain syndrome and low satisfaction with postoperative anesthesia.

About the Authors

M. O. Popov
Central City Clinical Hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Popov Maxim O., Anesthesiologist and Intensivist at the Department  of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Central City Clinical Hospital № 1

15, Dekabristov str., Ekaterinburg, 620026



S. V. Kinzhalova
Ural Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care; Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Kinzhalova Svetlana V., Dr. of Sci (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Intensive Care Unit, Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care; Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Toxicology, Ural State Medical University

1, Repin str., Ekaterinburg, 620028

3, Repin str., Ekaterinburg, Russia, 620028



G. V. Sobetova
Central City Clinical Hospital № 1; Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sobetova Galina V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Central City Clinical Hospital № 1; Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Toxicology, Ural State Medical University

15, Dekabristov str., Ekaterinburg, 620026

3, Repin str., Ekaterinburg, 620028



References

1. Danilov Al. B., Isagulyan E. D., Mackaschova E. S. Psychogenic pain. S. S. Kor sakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2018, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 103–108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2018118111103.

2. Zagorulko O. I., Medvedeva L. A., Drakina O. V., Loginova O. I. Predictors of chronic pelvic pain in female population. Russian Journal of Pain, 2023, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 58–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/pain20232102158.

3. Koberskaya N. N., Tabeeva G. R. A role of cognitive and emotional factors in formation of pain. S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2021, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 111–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2021121111111.

4. Kutlubaev M. A., Akhmadeeva L. R. Phenomenon of catastrophizing in pain syndromes and pathological fatigue. Nevrologicheskij zhurnal, 2015, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 48–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9545-2015-20-5-48-54.

5. Morozov A.M., Sergeev A.N., Kadykov V.A., et al. Сhronic pain syndrome, risk factors for its development at stage of operative intervention. Siberian Medical Review, 2021, no. 5, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2021-5-5-13.

6. Ovechkin A. M. Postoperative pain: the state of problem and current trends in postoperative analgesia. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management, 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 29–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/RA36255.

7. Ovechkin A. M., Bayalieva A. Zh., Ezhevskaya A. A. et al. Postoperative analgesia. Annals of Critical Care, 2019, no. 4, pp. 9–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2019-4-9-33.

8. Popov M. O., Kinzhalova S. V., Davydova N. S., Sidenkova A. P. Mechanisms of development of postoperative pain syndrome in gynecological patients. Ural Medical Journal, 2023, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 94–103. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-6-94-103.

9. Radchikova N. P., Adashiskaya G. A., Sanoyan T. R., Shupta A. A. Russian adap tation of the pain catastrophizing scale. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2020, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 169–187. (In Russ.). https://doi:10.17759/cpse.2020090409.

10. Tsedinova Y. B., Churyukanov M. V., Medvedeva L. A. et al. Psycho logical characteristics of patients with chronic postsurgical pain. Rus sian Journal of Pain, 2020, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 29–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/pain20201802129

11. Annunziata M. A., Muzzatti B., Bidoli E. et al. Hospital Anxiety and Depres sion Scale (HADS) accuracy in cancer patients // Support Care Cancer. – 2020. – Vol. 28, № 8. – P. 3921–3926. https://doi:10.1007/s00520-019-05244-8.

12. Benlolo S., Hanlon, J. G., Shirreff, L. et al. Predictors of persistent postsurgical pain after hysterectomy - a prospective cohort study // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. – 2021. – Vol. 28, № 12. – P. 2036–2046. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.017.

13. Celikel F. C., Saatcioglu O. Alexithymia and anxiety in female chronic pain patients // Ann Gen Psychiatry. – 2006. – Vol. 5, № 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-5-13.

14. Gerbershagen H. J., Aduckathil S., van Wijck A.J. et al. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical pro cedures // Anesthesiology. – 2013. – Vol. 118, №. 4. – P. 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3. PMID: 23392233.

15. Lee S., Xue Y., Petricca J. et al. The impact of pre-operative depression on pain outcomes after major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Anaes thesia. – 2024. – Vol. 79, № 4. – P. 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16188.

16. Levett D. Z. H., Grimmett C. Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgi cal outcomes: evidence and future directions // Anaesthesia. – 2019. – Vol. 74, Suppl. 1. – P. 36–42. https://doi:10.1111/anae.14507.

17. Luminet O., Nielson, K. A. Alexithymia: toward an experimental, proces sual affective science with effective interventions // Annual review of psy chology. – 2025. – Vol. 76, № 1. – P. 741–769. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-021424-030718.

18. Middendorp H., Lumley M.A., Jacobs J.W.G. et al. The effects of anger and sadness on clinical pain reports and experimentally-induced pain thresholds in women with and without fibromyalgia // Arthritis Care & Research. – 2010. – Vol. 62, № 10. – P. 1370–1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20230.

19. Nazarinasab, M., Motamedfar A., Ahmadzadeh, A. et al. Comparison of anxiety level in patients under uterine fibroid treatment by myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE) and its relationship with pain and duration of postoperative hospitalization in Ahvaz educational hospitals in 2018 // Journal of family medicine and primary care. – 2021. – Vol. 10, №. 12. – P. 4586–4593. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1213_21.

20. Nelson G., Altman A. D., Nick A. et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations – Part II // Gynecol Oncol. – 2016. – Vol. 140, № 2. – P. 323–332. https://doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019.

21. Nyklíček I., Vingerhoets A. J. J. M. Alexithymia is associated with low toler ance to experimental painful stimulation // Pain. – 2000. – Vol. 85, № 3. – P. 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959 (99)00295-X.

22. Ohnesorge H., Günther V., Grünewald M. et al. Postoperative pain manage ment in obstetrics and gynecology // Journal of the Turkish German Gy necological Association. – 2020. – Vol. 21, № 4. – P. 287–297. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2020.0024.

23. Pollatos O., Dietel A., Gündel H., Duschek S. Alexithymic trait, painful heat stimulation, and everyday pain experience // Front.Psychiatry. – 2015. – Vol. 6, № 139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00139

24. Sullivan M. J., D’Eon J. L. Relation between catastrophizing and depression in chronic pain patients // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. – 1990. – Vol. 99, № 3. – P. 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.99.3.260.

25. Wallace K., Stewart E. A., Wise L. A. et al. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life after procedural intervention for uterine fibroids // Journal of women’s health. – 2022. – Vol. 31, № 3. – P. 415–424. https://doi:10.1089/jwh.2020.8915.

26. Wiech K., Tracey I. The influence of negative emotions on pain: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms // Neuroimage. – 2009. – Vol. 47, № 3. – P. 987–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.059.


Review

For citations:


Popov M.O., Kinzhalova S.V., Sobetova G.V. The effectiveness of perioperative anesthesia during uterine surgery, taking into account the psychoemotional status of patients. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2025;22(4):67-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-4-65-75



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5658 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8653 (Online)