Preview

Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION

Advanced search

Modern approaches to choosing the method of regional anesthesia during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-4-32-42

Abstract

The objective was to analyze the literature on modern approaches to the choice of regional anesthesia method for thoracoscopic surgical interventions. Materials and methods. A review of the most common approaches to the choice of regional anesthesia method for thoracoscopic surgical interventions was carried out.

Results. The analysis of the literature has shown that to date, in the practice of an anesthesiologist and intensivist, there is no single standard for anesthesia of patients during and after thoracoscopic operations, but the use of regional anesthesia methods can increase the positive effects of minimally invasive methods, which include video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATS). Further studies comparing the efficacy of regional anesthesia methods in thoracic surgery are needed.

Conclusion. At the moment, the evidence collected in the world specialized literature confirms that thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block can be considered comparatively effective methods of regional anesthesia in VATS. Meanwhile, high-quality comparative clinical studies that allow us to choose the most effective and safe method of regional anesthesia are limited.

About the Authors

Yu. A. Ivanishcheva
B. N. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery
Russian Federation

Ivanishcheva Yulia A., Junior Research Fellow, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991



A. Yu. Zaytsev
Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Zaytsev Andrey Yu., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Chief of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation; Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991

8, Trubetskaya str., Moscow, 119991



A. A. Kavochkin
B. N. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Kavochkin Aleksey A., Junior Research Fellow, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1; Assistant, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991

8, Trubetskaya str., Moscow, 119991



D. G. Kabakov
B. N. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Kabakov Dmitry G., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Junior Research Fellow, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation; Assistant, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991

8, Trubetskaya str., Moscow, 119991



M. A. Vyzhigina
B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surger
Russian Federation

Vyzhigina Margarita A., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Research Fellow, Anesthesiologist and Intensivist, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991



K. V. Dubrovin
B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Dubrovin Kirill V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Anesthesiologist and Intensivist, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department I, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation, B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, Associate Professor, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, N. V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine

Author ID: 701800

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991

8, Trubetskaya str., Moscow, 119991



D. V. Bazarov
B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery
Russian Federation

Bazarov Dmitry V., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Scientific and Clinical Center 1, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation

2, Abrikosovsky Lane, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Bazarov D.V., Toneev E.A., Vyzhigina M.A. et al. Multidisciplinary approach in management of postoperative pain in modern thoracic surgery. Russian jounal of pain, 2019, no. 2, pp. 14–19. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25731/ RASP.2019.02.15.

2. Bayman E. O., Parekh K. O., Keech J. et al. Preoperative patient expectations of postoperative pain are associated with moderate to severe acute pain after VATS // Pain Med. – 2019. – Vol. 20, № 3. – P. 543–554. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny096.

3. Brodsky J. B., Cohen E. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // Current opinion in Anesthesiology. – 2000. – Vol. 13, № 1. – P. 41. DOI: 10.1097/00 001503-200002000-00007.

4. Chen N., Qiao Q., Chen R. et al. The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial // J Clin Anesth. – 2020. – Vol. 59. – P. 106–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.002.

5. Chen W., Bai Y.-Y., Zhang L.-H. et al. Prevalence and predictors of chronic postsurgical pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Pain Ther. – 2023. – Vol. 12, № 1. – P. 117–139. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00439-0.

6. Chu H., Dong H., Wang Y. et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block on MMP-9 and postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial // BMC Anesthesiology. – 2020. – Vol. 20, № 1. – P. 59. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-00976-1

7. Davies R. G., Myles P. S., Graham J. M. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Br J Anaesth. – 2006. – Vol. 96, № 4. – P. 418–426. DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael020.

8. Ding W., Chen Y., Li D. et al. Investigation of single-dose thoracic paravertebral analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracoscopic lobectomy – A randomized controlled trial // International Journal of Surgery. – 2018. – Vol. 57. – P. 8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.006.

9. Feray S., Lubach J., Joshi G. P. et al. PROSPECT guidelines for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations // Anaesthesia. – 2022. – Vol. 77, № 3. – P. 311–325. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15609.

10. Finnerty D. T., McMahon A., McNamara J. R. et al. Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial // Br J Anaesth. – 2020. – Vol. 125, № 5. – P. 802–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020.

11. Gaballah K. M., Soltan W. A., Bahgat N. M. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block versus erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopy: a pilot randomized controlled trial // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. – 2019. – Vol. 33, № 7. – P. 1946–1953. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.02.028.

12. Harky A., Clarke C. G., Kar A. et al. Epidural analgesia versus paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. – 2019. – Vol. 28, № 3. – P. 404–406. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy265.

13. Hotta K., Endo T., Taira K. et al. Comparison of the analgesic effects of continuous extrapleural block and continuous epidural block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. – 2011. – Vol. 25, № 6. – P. 1009–1013. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.026.

14. Huang Q.-W., Li J.-B., Huang Y. et al. A comparison of analgesia after a thoracoscopic lung cancer operation with a sustained epidural block and a sustained paravertebral block: a randomized controlled study // Adv Ther. – 2020. – Vol. 37, № 9. – P. 4000–4014. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01446-3.

15. Hutchins J., Sanchez J., Andrade R. et al. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral catheter versus intercostal blocks for postoperative pain control in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized trial // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. – 2017. – Vol. 31, № 2. – P. 458–463. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.08.010.

16. Imperatori A., Rotolo N., Gatti M. et al. Peri-operative complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) // International Journal of Surgery. – 2008. – Vol. 6. – P. S78–S81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.014.

17. Jahangiri Fard A., Farzanegan B., Khalili A. et al. Paracetamol instead of ketorolac in post-video-assisted thoracic surgery pain management: a randomized trial // Anesth Pain Med. – 2016. – Vol. 6, № 6. – P. e39175. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.39175.

18. Kang K., Meng X., Li B. et al. Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. – 2020. – Vol. 18, №1. – P. 298. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02071-8.

19. Kaplowitz J., Papadakos P. J. Acute pain management for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an update // journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. – 2012. – Vol. 26, № 2. – P. 312–321. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.04.010.

20. Kashiwagi Y., Iida T., Kunisawa T. et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block compared with the epidural analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // Masui. – 2015. – Vol. 64, № 10. – P. 1010–1014.

21. Komatsu T., Kino A., Inoue M. et al. Paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: analgesic effectiveness and role in fast-track surgery // Int J Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 12, № 9. – P. 936–939. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.272.

22. Kosiński S., Fryźlewicz E., Wiłkojć M. et al. Comparison of continuous epidural block and continuous paravertebral block in postoperative analgaesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a randomised, non-inferiority trial // Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. – 2016. – Vol. 48, № 5. – P. 280–287. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2016.0059. 23. Loop T. Fast track in thoracic surgery and anaesthesia: update of concepts // Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. – 2016. – Vol. 29, № 1. – P. 20–25. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000282.

23. Maund E., McDaid C., Wright K. et al. Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphine-related side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review // Br J Anaesth. – 2011. – Vol. 106, № 3. – P. 292–297. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq406.

24. Mehrotra M., D’Cruz J. R., Arthur M. E. Video-assisted thoracoscopy // StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing – 2022.

25. Okajima H., Tanaka O., Ushio M. et al. Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides comparable analgesia and fewer episodes of hypotension than continuous epidural block after lung surgery // J Anesth. – 2015. – Vol. 29, № 3. – P. 373–378. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1947-y.

26. Ökmen K., Metin Ökmen B. Evaluation of the effect of serratus anterior plane block for pain treatment after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. – 2018. – Vol. 37, № 4. – P. 349–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.09.005.

27. Raveglia F., Rizzi A., Leporati A. et al. Analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: Epidural versus paravertebral technique. A randomized, double– blind, prospective study // The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. – 2014. – Vol. 147, № 1. – P. 469–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.024.

28. Schug S. A., Lavand’homme P., Barke A. et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain // Pain. – 2019. – Vol. 160, № 1. – P. 45–52. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001413.

29. Schug S. A., Bruce J. Risk stratification for the development of chronic postsurgical pain // Pain Rep. – 2017. – Vol. 2, № 6. – P. e627. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000627.

30. Semyonov M., Fedorina E., Grinshpun J. et al. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracic surgery // J Pain Res. – 2019. – Vol. 12. – P. 953–960. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S191263.

31. Sihoe A. D. L. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery // Respirology. – 2020. – Vol. 25, № S2. – P. 49–60. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13920.

32. Simpson W. Anaesthesia for thoracic surgery // Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. – 2017. – Vol. 18, № 12. – P. 593–597. DOI: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2017.09.010.

33. Sinha A., Carli F. The role of regional anaesthesia in patient outcome: thoracic and abdominal surgeries // Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. – 2008. – Vol. 12, № 4. – P. 183–193. DOI: 10.1053/j.trap.2008.09.003.

34. Solaini L., Prusciano F., Bagioni P. et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung // Surg Endosc. – 2008. – Vol. 22, № 2. – P. 298–310. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9586-0.

35. Spaans L. N., Dijkgraaf M. G. W., Meijer P. et al. Optimal postoperative pain management after VATS lung resection by thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous paravertebral block or single–shot intercostal nerve block (OPtriAL): study protocol of a three-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial // BMC Surgery. – 2022. – Vol. 22, № 1. – P. 330. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-02-0176-y.

36. Steinthorsdottir K. J., Wildgaard L., Hansen H. J. et al. Regional analgesia for video–assisted thoracic surgery: a systematic review // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 45, № 6. – P. 959–966. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt525.

37. Sun K., Liu D., Chen J. et al. Moderate-severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A retrospective study // Sci Rep. – 2020. – Vol. 10, № 1. – P. 795. DOI: 10.1038/s41598–020–57620–8.

38. Taketa Y., Irisawa Y., Fujitani T. Comparison of ultrasound–guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video–assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled non–inferiority clinical trial // Reg Anesth Pain Med. – 2020. – Vol. 45. – P. 10–15. DOI: 10.1136/rapm–2019–100827.

39. Tong Y., Wei P., Wang S. et al. Characteristics of postoperative pain after vats and pain–related factors: the experience in national cancer center of China // JPR. – 2020. – Vol. 13. – P. 1861–1867. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S249134.

40. Tseng W.-C., Lin W.-L., Lai H.-C. et al. Fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with low dose of ketamine is not inferior to thoracic epidural analgesia for acute post-thoracotomy pain following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled study // Medicine (Baltimore). – 2019. – Vol. 98, № 28. – P. e16403. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016403.

41. Umari M., Falini S., Segat M. et al. Anesthesia and fast-track in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): from evidence to practice // J Thorac Dis. – 2018. – Vol. 10, № 4. – P. S542–S554. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.83.

42. Veit S. Pain Management in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) // Zentralbl Chir. – 2014. – Vol. 139, Suppl 1. – P. S34–8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383030.

43. Wolf A., Liu B., Leoncini E. et al. Outcomes for thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy not just technique dependent: a study of 9,787 patients // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2018. – Vol. 105, № 3. – P. 886–891. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.09.059.

44. Wu Z., Fang S., Wang Q. et al. Patient-controlled paravertebral block for video–assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized trial // Ann Thorac Surg. – 2018. – Vol. 106, № 3. – P. 888–894. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.036.

45. Yan T. D., Cao C., D’Amico T. A. et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. – 2014. – Vol. 45, № 4. – P. 633–639. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt463.

46. Yeap Y. L., Wolfe J. W., Backfish-White K. M. et al. Randomized prospective study evaluating single–injection paravertebral block, paravertebral catheter, and thoracic epidural catheter for postoperative regional analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. – 2020. – Vol. 34, № 7. – P. 1870–1876. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.036.

47. Yoon S., Hong W.-P., Joo H. et al. Long-term incidence of chronic postsurgical pain after thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a 10-year single-center retrospective study // Reg Anesth Pain Med. – 2020. – Vol. 45, № 5. – P. 331–336. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101292.

48. Zhang X., Shu L., Lin C. et al. Comparison between intraoperative two–space injection thoracic paravertebral block and wound infiltration as a component of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. – 2015. – Vol. 29, № 6. – P. 1550–1556. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.06.013.

49. Zhao H., Xin L., Feng Y. The effect of preoperative erector spinae plane vs. paravertebral blocks on patient-controlled oxycodone consumption after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective randomized, blinded, non-inferiority study // J Clin Anesth. – 2020. – Vol. 62. – P. 109737. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109737.


Review

For citations:


Ivanishcheva Yu.A., Zaytsev A.Yu., Kavochkin A.A., Kabakov D.G., Vyzhigina M.A., Dubrovin K.V., Bazarov D.V. Modern approaches to choosing the method of regional anesthesia during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION. 2024;21(4):32-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-4-32-42



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5658 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8653 (Online)